Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
682 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 682 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 682 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of Sowler John's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Sowler John hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 682 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Sowler John’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Sowler John's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
02:44.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 682 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
John Sowler's performance in the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race puts him in the elite tier of athletes, achieving an overall rank of 35 out of 1910 competitors and ranking 11th within his age group (35-39). This places him in the top 1% and 2% respectively—an impressive feat. Notably, John's strengths lie in his ability to excel at strength-focused exercises, as evidenced by his faster than average times in the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Wall Balls segments. His total running time, however, was 01:13 slower than the average, suggesting a more strength-oriented profile. Despite this, his last running segment was faster than average, indicating potential underutilized running capabilities or an effective conservation of energy for a strong finish. The analysis suggests John started slightly too slow in his initial running segments, which could have impacted his pacing strategy for the race.
Segments to Improve:
Running Segments & Total Running Time: With each running segment being slower than average, and a total running time indicating a strength rather than a runner's profile, it's clear that improvement in running efficiency and stamina could significantly enhance John's overall performance. To address this, incorporating interval training, such as 400 to 800-meter repeats at a pace faster than his current average, with equal rest periods, could boost both speed and cardiovascular endurance. Additionally, endurance runs, at a steady pace slightly faster than his average race pace, will help improve his overall running stamina.
Sandbag Lunges: This segment was significantly slower than average, suggesting potential areas for improvement in lower body strength and endurance. Incorporating weighted lunges, Bulgarian split squats, and plyometric exercises such as jump squats into his training regimen could enhance his power and efficiency during this challenging segment. Focusing on form and controlled movements during these exercises will also help prevent injury and ensure the most effective transfer of training to race performance.
Race Strategies:
Pacing Strategy: Given John's tendency to start slow in the running segments, adopting a more aggressive start might benefit his overall time. A slight increase in pace during the initial runs, while ensuring not to overextend, could improve his positioning early on without compromising his strength in the latter portions of the race. Practicing pacing strategies in training, identifying an optimal 'comfortably hard' pace for the running segments, can aid in finding the right balance.
Transition and Roxzone Improvement: John's faster-than-average Roxzone time suggests minimal rest and swift transitions, which is a strength. However, further reducing this time through practice of quick transitions between exercises and strategizing the layout of his equipment (where possible) can shave off crucial seconds. Incorporating transition drills into workouts, where John swiftly moves from one exercise modality to the next, can mimic race conditions and improve his efficiency.
Strength and Endurance Balance: Given John's evident strength in specific exercises, focusing on maintaining this advantage while improving running endurance will make him a more well-rounded athlete. A balanced training approach, which does not neglect strength training while increasing running volume, will ensure that improvements in running do not come at the expense of his strength performance.
Overall, John's performance is commendable, but with targeted improvements in his running efficiency and specific strength segments, there's potential for even greater achievements. Tailoring his training to address these areas while leveraging his existing strengths will undoubtedly lead to improved future race outcomes.