Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lightfoot Oliver's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lightfoot Oliver's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lightfoot Oliver's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lightfoot Oliver's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:24 | 06:51 to 05:27 | 45.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:42 | 05:06 to 04:24 | 22.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:39 | 04:52 to 04:13 | 21.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:11 | 04:38 to 04:27 | 5.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 02:03 to 01:53 | 5.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:59 to 38:59 | 0.0% |
| Lightfoot Oliver | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:27 | 00:00 | 04:23 +01:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 05:27 | 04:21 -00:16 | 04:23 +01:04 |
| Running 2 | 04:30 | 09:32 | 04:44 -00:14 | 08:44 +00:48 |
| Sled Push | 02:13 | 14:02 | 02:44 -00:31 | 13:28 +00:34 |
| Running 3 | 04:49 | 16:15 | 05:07 -00:18 | 16:12 +00:03 |
| Sled Pull | 04:52 | 21:04 | 04:34 +00:18 | 21:19 -00:15 |
| Running 4 | 04:49 | 25:56 | 05:05 -00:16 | 25:53 +00:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:38 | 30:45 | 04:54 -00:16 | 30:58 -00:13 |
| Running 5 | 04:52 | 35:23 | 05:15 -00:23 | 35:52 -00:29 |
| Rowing | 04:24 | 40:15 | 04:41 -00:17 | 41:07 -00:52 |
| Running 6 | 04:54 | 44:39 | 05:07 -00:13 | 45:48 -01:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 49:33 | 02:03 +00:00 | 50:55 -01:22 |
| Running 7 | 04:37 | 51:36 | 05:06 -00:29 | 52:58 -01:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:06 | 56:13 | 04:44 +00:22 | 58:04 -01:51 |
| Running 8 | 05:05 | 01:01:19 | 05:35 -00:30 | 01:02:48 -01:29 |
| Wall Balls | 06:51 | 01:06:24 | 05:58 +00:53 | 01:08:23 -01:59 |
| Roxzone | 07:21 | 01:20:28 | 06:07 +01:14 | 01:20:28 |
Oliver Lightfoot has shown a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event. As a top 23% overall and top 28% in his age group, Oliver exhibits a blend of strength and endurance. His total running time of 38:59, which is 1:37 faster than the average, suggests he has a strong runner's profile. However, his slower Roxzone time indicates that he may need to improve his overall fitness and transition time. His pacing during the race was generally consistent, with the exception of the first segment where he started slower than average. This could suggest a cautious approach or a potential area for improvement.
Oliver should consider starting his run segments at a faster pace. Given his overall strong running performance, he could gain time by pushing harder at the beginning. During the race, focusing on efficient transitions between exercises can also help cut down his overall time. Lastly, incorporating a more comprehensive warm-up routine may help prepare his body and mind for the intensity of the race from the start.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tigges Brandon | 2022 Dallas | 01:20:24 | |
| Nojac Landry | 2024 Malaga | 01:20:07 | |
| Sneddon Jack | 2024 Glasgow | 01:20:12 | |
| Wilkinson Dan | 2021 Birmingham | 01:20:58 | |
| Pilkington Andy | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:20:16 | |
| Li Victor | 2024 Incheon | 01:20:06 | |
| Schubert Jakub | 2023 Stockholm | 01:20:34 | |
| Marin Guiseppe | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:20:26 | |
| Hart Callum | 2024 Sydney | 01:20:30 | |
| Urquhart Mark | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:20:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
