Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 219 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Knepp Rachel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Knepp Rachel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Knepp Rachel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Knepp Rachel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:28 | 01:01:24 to 57:56 | 67.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:24 | 08:12 to 06:48 | 27.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:15 | 08:12 to 07:57 | 4.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:41 to 05:41 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:39 to 03:39 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 08:09 to 08:09 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:55 to 05:55 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:33 to 02:33 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:55 to 06:55 | 0.0% |
| Knepp Rachel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:12 | 00:00 | 06:19 -01:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:41 | 05:12 | 05:36 +00:05 | 06:19 -01:07 |
| Running 2 | 06:37 | 10:53 | 06:57 -00:20 | 11:55 -01:02 |
| Sled Push | 03:39 | 17:30 | 03:32 +00:07 | 18:52 -01:22 |
| Running 3 | 08:10 | 21:09 | 07:35 +00:35 | 22:24 -01:15 |
| Sled Pull | 08:12 | 29:19 | 07:46 +00:26 | 29:59 -00:40 |
| Running 4 | 08:10 | 37:31 | 07:35 +00:35 | 37:45 -00:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:09 | 45:41 | 09:53 -01:44 | 45:20 +00:21 |
| Running 5 | 09:09 | 53:50 | 08:03 +01:06 | 55:13 -01:23 |
| Rowing | 05:55 | 01:02:59 | 06:03 -00:08 | 01:03:16 -00:17 |
| Running 6 | 07:45 | 01:08:54 | 07:46 -00:01 | 01:09:19 -00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:33 | 01:16:39 | 02:52 -00:19 | 01:17:05 -00:26 |
| Running 7 | 07:45 | 01:19:12 | 07:49 -00:04 | 01:19:57 -00:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:12 | 01:26:57 | 07:18 +00:54 | 01:27:46 -00:49 |
| Running 8 | 08:40 | 01:35:09 | 08:55 -00:15 | 01:35:04 +00:05 |
| Wall Balls | 06:55 | 01:43:49 | 07:40 -00:45 | 01:43:59 -00:10 |
| Roxzone | 11:01 | 02:01:35 | 09:56 +01:05 | 02:01:35 |
Rachel's total running time of 01:01:24 was 01:25 slower than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she may need to improve her overall fitness and transition time to decrease the time spent in the roxzone. Additionally, her total running time was slower than average, suggesting that she could benefit from focusing more on her running training.
In conclusion, Rachel Knepp had a solid performance in the Hyrox race in Chicago. By focusing on improving her running performance, particularly in segments such as Running 5, Sandbag Lunges, Running 3, and Running 4, she can enhance her overall race performance. Incorporating specific training strategies, exercises, and drills tailored to these areas will help her build strength, endurance, and efficiency. Additionally, implementing race strategies such as pacing, efficient transitions, and mental preparation will also contribute to her improvement in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Artal Alice | 2024 Paris | 02:01:59 | |
| Morgan Amelia | 2024 Glasgow | 02:01:51 | |
| Tse Nok Man | 2024 Taipei | 02:02:03 | |
| Kelly Nicola | 2024 Stockholm | 02:01:20 | |
| Cakin Joany | 2024 Paris | 02:01:58 | |
| Horsmans Kelly | 2018 Essen | 02:01:40 | |
| Keller Kristina | 2024 Stuttgart | 02:01:48 | |
| HudsonSmith Emma | 2024 Manchester | 02:01:47 | |
| Lidstone Claire | 2023 London | 02:01:37 | |
| Uppal Happie | 2024 Manchester | 02:01:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
