Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Jordan Ben's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Jordan Ben's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Jordan Ben's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Jordan Ben's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:16. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:30 | 42:59 to 41:29 | 45.9% |
| Rowing | 00:36 | 05:19 to 04:43 | 18.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:29 | 05:17 to 04:48 | 14.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:22 | 04:58 to 04:36 | 11.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:34 to 04:22 | 6.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:07 | 05:05 to 04:58 | 3.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Jordan Ben | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:51 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 04:51 | 04:26 +00:08 | 04:35 +00:16 |
| Running 2 | 04:53 | 09:25 | 04:55 -00:02 | 09:01 +00:24 |
| Sled Push | 02:14 | 14:18 | 02:51 -00:37 | 13:56 +00:22 |
| Running 3 | 05:13 | 16:32 | 05:22 -00:09 | 16:47 -00:15 |
| Sled Pull | 04:58 | 21:45 | 04:53 +00:05 | 22:09 -00:24 |
| Running 4 | 05:09 | 26:43 | 05:20 -00:11 | 27:02 -00:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:05 | 31:52 | 05:17 -00:12 | 32:22 -00:30 |
| Running 5 | 05:34 | 36:57 | 05:31 +00:03 | 37:39 -00:42 |
| Rowing | 05:19 | 42:31 | 04:48 +00:31 | 43:10 -00:39 |
| Running 6 | 05:24 | 47:50 | 05:22 +00:02 | 47:58 -00:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 53:14 | 02:10 -00:16 | 53:20 -00:06 |
| Running 7 | 05:34 | 55:08 | 05:21 +00:13 | 55:30 -00:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:17 | 01:00:42 | 05:03 +00:14 | 01:00:51 -00:09 |
| Running 8 | 06:24 | 01:05:59 | 05:57 +00:27 | 01:05:54 +00:05 |
| Wall Balls | 05:35 | 01:12:23 | 06:27 -00:52 | 01:11:51 +00:32 |
| Roxzone | 07:12 | 01:25:03 | 06:45 +00:27 | 01:25:03 |
Ben Jordan delivered a solid performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, placing in the top 28% of all participants and the top 31% in his age group. His overall time of 01:25:03 highlights his capability, though certain areas indicate room for improvement. Ben's total running time was 00:12 slower than the average, suggesting he has a hybrid profile with a balance between running and strength activities. The initial running segments suggest he may have started slightly too fast, as his pace slowed in the latter stages. This pacing strategy, combined with a slightly slower Roxzone transition time, indicates an opportunity to enhance both endurance and transition efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pizzichini Valerio | 2024 Milan | 01:25:12 | |
| Loughlin James | 2023 Houston | 01:25:09 | |
| Rennie Greg | 2024 Madrid | 01:25:28 | |
| Eldin De Pecoulas Thibaud | 2024 Milan | 01:25:00 | |
| Carralero Pérez Eduardo | 2021 Madrid | 01:24:39 | |
| Lim Changhyun | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:24:55 | |
| Debenham Sam | 2024 Madrid | 01:25:24 | |
| Lawal Abiola | 2024 Dubai | 01:25:17 | |
| Buning Matthijs | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:24:52 | |
| Martin Jack | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:25:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
