Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gwilliam Dave's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gwilliam Dave's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gwilliam Dave's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gwilliam Dave's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:50 | 09:03 to 06:13 | 59.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:47 | 06:35 to 05:48 | 16.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:34 | 02:59 to 02:25 | 11.8% |
| Rowing | 00:16 | 05:18 to 05:02 | 5.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:11 | 05:44 to 05:33 | 3.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:09 | 07:37 to 07:28 | 3.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:13 to 03:13 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 46:03 to 46:03 | 0.0% |
| Gwilliam Dave | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:34 | 00:00 | 04:59 -01:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 03:34 | 04:38 -00:15 | 04:59 -01:25 |
| Running 2 | 05:43 | 07:57 | 05:26 +00:17 | 09:37 -01:40 |
| Sled Push | 03:13 | 13:40 | 03:19 -00:06 | 15:03 -01:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:58 | 16:53 | 05:58 +00:00 | 18:22 -01:29 |
| Sled Pull | 05:44 | 22:51 | 05:41 +00:03 | 24:20 -01:29 |
| Running 4 | 06:15 | 28:35 | 05:57 +00:18 | 30:01 -01:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:03 | 34:50 | 06:24 +02:39 | 35:58 -01:08 |
| Running 5 | 06:42 | 43:53 | 06:13 +00:29 | 42:22 +01:31 |
| Rowing | 05:18 | 50:35 | 05:05 +00:13 | 48:35 +02:00 |
| Running 6 | 06:24 | 55:53 | 06:02 +00:22 | 53:40 +02:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:59 | 01:02:17 | 02:27 +00:32 | 59:42 +02:35 |
| Running 7 | 06:40 | 01:05:16 | 06:01 +00:39 | 01:02:09 +03:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:35 | 01:11:56 | 05:59 +00:36 | 01:08:10 +03:46 |
| Running 8 | 04:51 | 01:18:31 | 06:59 -02:08 | 01:14:09 +04:22 |
| Wall Balls | 07:37 | 01:23:22 | 07:50 -00:13 | 01:21:08 +02:14 |
| Roxzone | 06:26 | 01:37:15 | 08:17 -01:51 | 01:37:15 |
Dave Gwilliam's performance at the 2024 Dublin HYROX race was commendable, placing him in the top 52% of all athletes and top 47% within his age group (45-49). Notably, his overall running time was faster than average by 01:45, indicating a strong running profile. It is also worth mentioning that he started exceptionally strong, with his first run being 01:23 faster than average. However, a gradual slowdown was observed in subsequent running segments. This suggests that pacing may need to be a focus for improvement in future races. His roxzone time was also noteworthy, being 01:46 faster than average, indicating good fitness level and transition time.
Start the race at a sustainable pace, considering the total distance and the number of segments. This will help you maintain your energy levels throughout the race and prevent too much fatigue in the later segments. Implement more strategic rest periods during transitions to recover better and maintain a steady pace. Also, continually work on improving your transition times. Remember, every second spent in the roxzone is time that could be used in the active segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Drieling Jonas | 2024 Köln | 01:37:16 | |
| Van Grinsven Nick | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:37:33 | |
| Reynolds Sheldon | 2023 Miami | 01:37:02 | |
| Slaven Ben | 2022 Birmingham | 01:37:38 | |
| Gargiulo Andrea | 2024 Milan | 01:37:14 | |
| Grelon Cosmas | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:37:09 | |
| Andresen Till | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:37:04 | |
| Neff Thibault | 2024 Marseille | 01:37:29 | |
| Price Dale | 2024 Manchester | 01:36:46 | |
| Pleus Christian | 2021 Hamburg | 01:37:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
