Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 652 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gillespie Chris's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gillespie Chris's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gillespie Chris's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gillespie Chris's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:20 | 54:51 to 52:31 | 53.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:08 | 08:42 to 07:34 | 26.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:36 | 07:34 to 06:58 | 13.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:17 | 03:08 to 02:51 | 6.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:49 to 03:49 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:57 to 05:57 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:13 to 05:13 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:56 to 07:56 | 0.0% |
| Gillespie Chris | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:45 | 00:00 | 05:31 +01:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:45 | 06:45 | 04:49 -00:04 | 05:31 +01:14 |
| Running 2 | 05:47 | 11:30 | 06:06 -00:19 | 10:20 +01:10 |
| Sled Push | 03:49 | 17:17 | 03:49 +00:00 | 16:26 +00:51 |
| Running 3 | 06:04 | 21:06 | 06:51 -00:47 | 20:15 +00:51 |
| Sled Pull | 05:57 | 27:10 | 06:37 -00:40 | 27:06 +00:04 |
| Running 4 | 06:45 | 33:07 | 06:47 -00:02 | 33:43 -00:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:42 | 39:52 | 07:44 +00:58 | 40:30 -00:38 |
| Running 5 | 07:19 | 48:34 | 07:10 +00:09 | 48:14 +00:20 |
| Rowing | 05:13 | 55:53 | 05:23 -00:10 | 55:24 +00:29 |
| Running 6 | 07:01 | 01:01:06 | 06:53 +00:08 | 01:00:47 +00:19 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:08 | 01:08:07 | 02:47 +00:21 | 01:07:40 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 07:08 | 01:11:15 | 06:56 +00:12 | 01:10:27 +00:48 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:34 | 01:18:23 | 07:16 +00:18 | 01:17:23 +01:00 |
| Running 8 | 08:05 | 01:25:57 | 08:32 -00:27 | 01:24:39 +01:18 |
| Wall Balls | 07:56 | 01:34:02 | 09:21 -01:25 | 01:33:11 +00:51 |
| Roxzone | 10:58 | 01:52:50 | 10:18 +00:40 | 01:52:50 |
Chris Gillespie performed commendably in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race, ranking in the top 61% of all athletes and top 59% of athletes in his age group (45-49). His overall time of 01:52:50 demonstrates a solid performance for his age group. Notably, his total running time was 00:20 faster than average, suggesting that he has a strong runner profile. However, his initial pacing in Running 1 seemed to be slower than average, indicating a potential area for improvement. Despite a slower start, Chris managed to maintain a good pace, even accelerating in segments like Running 2 and Running 3.
For better race performance, Chris could focus on a few specific strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Miezan Michael | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:52:50 | |
| Fliegel Mason | 2024 New York | 01:52:53 | |
| Niven Callum | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:52:30 | |
| Khalil Liam | 2024 Dallas | 01:53:19 | |
| De Jong Daan | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:53:19 | |
| Richardson Hayden | 2023 Birmingham | 01:53:15 | |
| Hanus Michal | 2024 Milan | 01:52:55 | |
| Mak Tim | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:52:42 | |
| Marzano Michele | 2024 London | 01:53:08 | |
| Morin Alexander | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:52:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 02:01:01 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
