Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Fleming William's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fleming William's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fleming William's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fleming William's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:15 | 46:34 to 42:19 | 68.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:12 | 06:21 to 05:09 | 19.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:22 | 06:36 to 06:14 | 5.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 02:19 to 02:05 | 3.8% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:50 to 04:46 | 1.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:28 to 04:25 | 0.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:55 to 03:55 | 0.0% |
| Fleming William | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:27 | 00:00 | 04:43 -00:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 04:27 | 04:28 +00:00 | 04:43 -00:16 |
| Running 2 | 04:40 | 08:55 | 05:02 -00:22 | 09:11 -00:16 |
| Sled Push | 02:10 | 13:35 | 02:57 -00:47 | 14:13 -00:38 |
| Running 3 | 05:48 | 15:45 | 05:28 +00:20 | 17:10 -01:25 |
| Sled Pull | 04:30 | 21:33 | 05:02 -00:32 | 22:38 -01:05 |
| Running 4 | 06:05 | 26:03 | 05:28 +00:37 | 27:40 -01:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:21 | 32:08 | 05:26 +00:55 | 33:08 -01:00 |
| Running 5 | 06:12 | 38:29 | 05:38 +00:34 | 38:34 -00:05 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 44:41 | 04:51 -00:01 | 44:12 +00:29 |
| Running 6 | 05:50 | 49:31 | 05:30 +00:20 | 49:03 +00:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 55:21 | 02:13 +00:06 | 54:33 +00:48 |
| Running 7 | 05:46 | 57:40 | 05:28 +00:18 | 56:46 +00:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:55 | 01:03:26 | 05:13 -01:18 | 01:02:14 +01:12 |
| Running 8 | 07:47 | 01:07:21 | 06:06 +01:41 | 01:07:27 -00:06 |
| Wall Balls | 06:36 | 01:15:08 | 06:39 -00:03 | 01:13:33 +01:35 |
| Roxzone | 05:34 | 01:27:13 | 07:01 -01:27 | 01:27:13 |
Based on the splits analysis, William's total running time of 00:46:34 was 04:46 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to focus more on improving his running performance. His best running lap time of 00:04:27 was 00:05 faster than average, suggesting that he has the potential to excel in this area.
In conclusion, William Fleming had a solid performance in the Hyrox race, placing in the top percentage of athletes in his age group. To improve his overall performance, he should focus on enhancing his running abilities, particularly in the weaker segments identified. Incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, form corrections, and strength exercises, can help him progress in these areas. Additionally, implementing race strategies such as pacing, efficient transitions, and mental preparation will contribute to his success in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Coxon Scott | 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:35 | |
| San Agustin Michael | 2021 Los Angeles | 01:27:13 | |
| Carroll Eoin | 2024 Dublin | 01:27:29 | |
| Norris Elliott | 2022 London | 01:27:01 | |
| Kalkeren T | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:27:28 | |
| Viaenllo Riccardo | 2024 Turin | 01:27:04 | |
| Segura Gabriel | 2024 Houston | 01:27:35 | |
| Pamfile William | 2024 Paris | 01:26:54 | |
| Monteseno Emanuele | 2024 Milan | 01:27:37 | |
| Owens Alex | 2024 Paris | 01:26:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:34:42 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
