Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Zufas Jerome's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Zufas Jerome's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Zufas Jerome's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Zufas Jerome's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:20 | 45:21 to 43:01 | 67.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:28 | 05:33 to 05:05 | 13.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:25 | 06:50 to 06:25 | 12.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:14 | 05:33 to 05:19 | 6.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Zufas Jerome | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:26 | 00:00 | 04:45 +00:41 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 05:26 | 04:29 -00:14 | 04:45 +00:41 |
| Running 2 | 05:04 | 09:41 | 05:06 -00:02 | 09:14 +00:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:13 | 14:45 | 03:00 -00:47 | 14:20 +00:25 |
| Running 3 | 05:44 | 16:58 | 05:33 +00:11 | 17:20 -00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 04:27 | 22:42 | 05:08 -00:41 | 22:53 -00:11 |
| Running 4 | 05:42 | 27:09 | 05:33 +00:09 | 28:01 -00:52 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:33 | 32:51 | 05:37 -00:04 | 33:34 -00:43 |
| Running 5 | 05:50 | 38:24 | 05:43 +00:07 | 39:11 -00:47 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 44:14 | 04:53 -00:09 | 44:54 -00:40 |
| Running 6 | 05:48 | 48:58 | 05:35 +00:13 | 49:47 -00:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 54:46 | 02:15 -00:21 | 55:22 -00:36 |
| Running 7 | 05:38 | 56:40 | 05:33 +00:05 | 57:37 -00:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:33 | 01:02:18 | 05:23 +00:10 | 01:03:10 -00:52 |
| Running 8 | 06:12 | 01:07:51 | 06:14 -00:02 | 01:08:33 -00:42 |
| Wall Balls | 06:50 | 01:14:03 | 06:49 +00:01 | 01:14:47 -00:44 |
| Roxzone | 08:03 | 01:28:49 | 07:13 +00:50 | 01:28:49 |
Jerome Zufas falls in the top 58% of all athletes in the 2024 Hamburg HYROX race, and ranks in the top 64% in his age group, 25-29. Despite a slower overall running time, Jerome shows a noteworthy performance in strength-based exercises like the Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Sled Pull. His strength-focused profile is clear, as his total running time was slower than average. However, Jerome's pacing strategy could use improvement, as he started slower than average in the first running segment and continued to lag behind in the subsequent running segments, suggesting he could benefit from a more aggressive start.
In future races, Jerome should consider starting more aggressively in the initial running segments to take advantage of his strength in the exercise zones. Working on transition speed in the Roxzone can also shave off valuable time. Additionally, incorporating more endurance-focused training could help Jerome maintain a faster pace throughout the race, improving his overall time. A more balanced approach between strength and cardiovascular training could help Jerome move towards a more hybrid profile, potentially enhancing his overall performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Frijns Jayden | 2024 Katowice | 01:29:16 | |
| Adams Ryan | 2023 Chicago | 01:29:17 | |
| Littler Jay | 2024 Manchester | 01:29:16 | |
| Golacki Piotr | 2023 Valencia | 01:28:26 | |
| Ahmed Abdi | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:13 | |
| Mede John | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:28:56 | |
| Boulangé Audren | 2024 Marseille | 01:28:37 | |
| Sale Richard | 2024 Madrid | 01:28:55 | |
| Rutherford John | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:18 | |
| Ramirez Sanabria Aarón | 2024 Mexico City | 01:29:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
