Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire OConnor Hugh's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights OConnor Hugh's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the OConnor Hugh's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve OConnor Hugh's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
05:12.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Hugh O'Connor demonstrated a commendable performance at the 2024 Milan Hyrox race, landing in the top 30% overall and top 36% within his age group. His total running time was notably quicker than average by 3 minutes and 23 seconds, indicating a strong running profile. However, the initial pacing during the first running segment was slightly slower than average, suggesting a conservative start that allowed for a progressively stronger pace throughout the race. This strategic pacing likely contributed to his overall running success, peaking with an impressive best running lap of 4 minutes and 24 seconds. Given these insights, Hugh seems to have a hybrid athletic profile with a stronger inclination towards running, though there is room to improve strength-oriented exercises.
Segments to Improve
Sled Pull:
The sled pull was a significant area for improvement, with a time 1 minute and 38 seconds slower than average. Focus on building upper body and core strength, as well as technique.
Exercises: Incorporate deadlifts, bent-over rows, and lat pull-downs to enhance pulling power.
Drills: Practice sled pull technique with lighter loads, gradually increasing weight to improve form and efficiency.
Form Correction: Ensure a strong hip hinge and engage the core to maintain posture and leverage during the pull.
Wall Balls:
The wall balls segment was 41 seconds slower than average. This suggests a need to improve explosive strength and endurance in the lower body and shoulders.
Exercises: Add squat-to-press and thrusters into your routine to mimic the wall ball movement.
Drills: Use a lighter medicine ball to focus on technique and gradually increase the weight as form improves.
Form Correction: Maintain a consistent squat depth and focus on a powerful drive through the legs and core to propel the ball upwards.
Roxzone:
The roxzone time was 31 seconds slower than average, indicating potential time lost during transitions. Enhancing overall fitness and transition efficiency is key.
Exercises: Incorporate high-intensity interval training (HIIT) to boost cardiovascular fitness and recovery speed.
Drills: Practice quick transitions between different exercises in training to simulate race conditions.
Sandbag Lunges:
The sandbag lunges were 34 seconds slower than average, highlighting the need for better lower body strength and endurance.
Exercises: Include lunges, step-ups, and Bulgarian split squats to build strength and balance.
Drills: Incorporate sandbag carries and lunges into circuit training to improve endurance under load.
Race Strategies
Pacing Strategy:
Consider maintaining a steady pace throughout the race, ensuring a stronger start to avoid the need for excessive catch-up. Implement negative splits in training to practice starting at a controlled pace and finishing strong.
Transition Efficiency:
Focus on minimizing time in the roxzone by practicing seamless transitions between exercises. This includes having a clear plan for equipment handling and reducing unnecessary rest periods.
Compromised Running:
Train for compromised running scenarios where running is performed immediately after strength tasks like sled pulls and wall balls. This will improve lactate tolerance and running efficiency post-exertion.