Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Malaga using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lever Mia's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lever Mia's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lever Mia's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lever Mia's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:19 | 06:11 to 04:52 | 33.1% |
| Rowing | 00:44 | 05:51 to 05:07 | 18.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:43 | 02:42 to 01:59 | 18.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:29 | 05:22 to 04:53 | 12.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:20 | 04:29 to 04:09 | 8.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:20 | 04:16 to 03:56 | 8.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 02:23 to 02:19 | 1.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:23 to 42:23 | 0.0% |
| Lever Mia | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:29 | 00:00 | 04:52 +00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:22 | 05:29 | 05:00 +00:22 | 04:52 +00:37 |
| Running 2 | 04:51 | 10:51 | 05:15 -00:24 | 09:52 +00:59 |
| Sled Push | 02:23 | 15:42 | 02:35 -00:12 | 15:07 +00:35 |
| Running 3 | 05:16 | 18:05 | 05:30 -00:14 | 17:42 +00:23 |
| Sled Pull | 06:11 | 23:21 | 05:20 +00:51 | 23:12 +00:09 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 29:32 | 05:31 -00:08 | 28:32 +01:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:05 | 34:55 | 05:34 -00:29 | 34:03 +00:52 |
| Running 5 | 05:14 | 40:00 | 05:39 -00:25 | 39:37 +00:23 |
| Rowing | 05:51 | 45:14 | 05:14 +00:37 | 45:16 -00:02 |
| Running 6 | 05:06 | 51:05 | 05:33 -00:27 | 50:30 +00:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:42 | 56:11 | 02:09 +00:33 | 56:03 +00:08 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 58:53 | 05:31 -00:16 | 58:12 +00:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:29 | 01:04:08 | 04:25 +00:04 | 01:03:43 +00:25 |
| Running 8 | 05:53 | 01:08:37 | 05:52 +00:01 | 01:08:08 +00:29 |
| Wall Balls | 04:16 | 01:14:30 | 04:28 -00:12 | 01:14:00 +00:30 |
| Roxzone | 06:07 | 01:24:44 | 06:16 -00:09 | 01:24:44 |
Mia Lever's performance in the 2024 Malaga Hyrox race places her impressively within the top echelons of her age group and overall participant field, highlighting her strong endurance and fitness level. A notable aspect of Mia's race was her total running time, which was 01:46 faster than average, indicating a strong runner profile. Despite this, there were segments where Mia's performance lagged, particularly in strength-focused tasks. Her pacing appeared to start slower, especially in Running 1, but improved significantly as the race progressed, suggesting an excellent ability to manage and distribute her energy throughout the race. However, the mixed performance across different segments suggests a hybrid athlete profile with a stronger inclination towards running.
By addressing these targeted areas for improvement and implementing strategic adjustments, Mia Lever has the potential to significantly enhance her Hyrox race performance, capitalizing on her running strengths while shoring up weaknesses in strength-focused segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hoffer Erin | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:24:42 | |
| Haines Natalie | 2023 London | 01:25:05 | |
| Fraisse Virginie | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:24:18 | |
| Svendsen Gretta | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:28 | |
| Gramet Melanie | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:24:29 | |
| Gorman Bethan | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:24:14 | |
| Hocking Gemma | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:24:55 | |
| Thomas Anoushka | 2024 Manchester | 01:25:04 | |
| Koehn Nicole | 2023 Anaheim | 01:24:59 | |
| Danois Julie | 2023 Sydney | 01:24:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Copenhagen | 01:24:44 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:01 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
