Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Clothier Kym's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Clothier Kym's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Clothier Kym's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Clothier Kym's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:52 | 48:46 to 43:54 | 73.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:37 | 05:52 to 05:15 | 9.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:33 | 06:05 to 05:32 | 8.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:33 | 02:45 to 02:12 | 8.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:17 to 04:17 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Clothier Kym | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:59 | 00:00 | 04:45 +00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 04:59 | 04:31 -00:10 | 04:45 +00:14 |
| Running 2 | 05:09 | 09:20 | 05:11 -00:02 | 09:16 +00:04 |
| Sled Push | 01:59 | 14:29 | 03:04 -01:05 | 14:27 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:36 | 16:28 | 05:39 -00:03 | 17:31 -01:03 |
| Sled Pull | 04:17 | 22:04 | 05:16 -00:59 | 23:10 -01:06 |
| Running 4 | 05:42 | 26:21 | 05:38 +00:04 | 28:26 -02:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:05 | 32:03 | 05:49 +00:16 | 34:04 -02:01 |
| Running 5 | 05:58 | 38:08 | 05:50 +00:08 | 39:53 -01:45 |
| Rowing | 04:52 | 44:06 | 04:56 -00:04 | 45:43 -01:37 |
| Running 6 | 05:50 | 48:58 | 05:41 +00:09 | 50:39 -01:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:45 | 54:48 | 02:18 +00:27 | 56:20 -01:32 |
| Running 7 | 05:59 | 57:33 | 05:39 +00:20 | 58:38 -01:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:52 | 01:03:32 | 05:30 +00:22 | 01:04:17 -00:45 |
| Running 8 | 09:37 | 01:09:24 | 06:22 +03:15 | 01:09:47 -00:23 |
| Wall Balls | 05:14 | 01:19:01 | 07:03 -01:49 | 01:16:09 +02:52 |
| Roxzone | 06:36 | 01:30:43 | 07:31 -00:55 | 01:30:43 |
Kym Clothier delivered a solid performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, ranking in the top 39% both overall and within his age group (45-49). His overall time was 01:30:43, demonstrating a commendable balance between running and strength elements. However, his total running time of 00:48:46 was 03:37 slower than average, indicating a potential area for improvement in running efficiency and endurance. Kym's performance in strength-based exercises, such as the Sled Push and Wall Balls, was notably strong, placing him in the 5th and 9th percentile ranks, respectively. The pacing analysis suggests that he started at a moderate pace, with minor fluctuations in speed across the running segments. Overall, Kym exhibits a hybrid profile with strengths in strength-based exercises, but there is room to enhance his running performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wesemann Fabian | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:30:18 | |
| Mateo Alvin | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:30:26 | |
| Mc Loughlin Sean | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:30:33 | |
| Charlton Josh | 2024 London | 01:30:51 | |
| Sterritt Aaron | 2023 Glasgow | 01:30:13 | |
| Barti Miralles Oriol | 2022 Valencia | 01:30:15 | |
| Canning Anthony | 2024 Berlin | 01:30:36 | |
| Van Duin Mark | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:31:03 | |
| 张 帅 | 2024 Beijing | 01:30:35 | |
| Chew Jeremy | 2024 London | 01:30:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
