Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Alcolea Lozano Alejandro's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Alcolea Lozano Alejandro's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Alcolea Lozano Alejandro's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Alcolea Lozano Alejandro's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:35 | 36:06 to 34:31 | 32.8% |
| Sled Push | 01:11 | 03:10 to 01:59 | 24.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:51 | 05:18 to 04:27 | 17.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:21 | 04:23 to 04:02 | 7.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:17 | 03:45 to 03:28 | 5.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:17 | 01:52 to 01:35 | 5.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:10 | 03:47 to 03:37 | 3.4% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:28 to 04:20 | 2.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:20 to 03:20 | 0.0% |
| Alcolea Lozano Alejandro | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:48 | 00:00 | 03:58 -00:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 03:48 | 04:11 +00:12 | 03:58 -00:10 |
| Running 2 | 04:28 | 08:11 | 04:15 +00:13 | 08:09 +00:02 |
| Sled Push | 03:10 | 12:39 | 02:27 +00:43 | 12:24 +00:15 |
| Running 3 | 04:39 | 15:49 | 04:33 +00:06 | 14:51 +00:58 |
| Sled Pull | 03:45 | 20:28 | 03:59 -00:14 | 19:24 +01:04 |
| Running 4 | 04:38 | 24:13 | 04:32 +00:06 | 23:23 +00:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:20 | 28:51 | 04:01 -00:41 | 27:55 +00:56 |
| Running 5 | 04:41 | 32:11 | 04:39 +00:02 | 31:56 +00:15 |
| Rowing | 04:28 | 36:52 | 04:28 +00:00 | 36:35 +00:17 |
| Running 6 | 04:37 | 41:20 | 04:33 +00:04 | 41:03 +00:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:52 | 45:57 | 01:49 +00:03 | 45:36 +00:21 |
| Running 7 | 04:27 | 47:49 | 04:33 -00:06 | 47:25 +00:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:47 | 52:16 | 04:02 -00:15 | 51:58 +00:18 |
| Running 8 | 04:52 | 56:03 | 04:52 +00:00 | 56:00 +00:03 |
| Wall Balls | 05:18 | 01:00:55 | 05:02 +00:16 | 01:00:52 +00:03 |
| Roxzone | 04:48 | 01:10:53 | 04:59 -00:11 | 01:10:53 |
Pacing and Profile:
Alejandro's overall pacing during the race was relatively consistent, with only minor variations in his split times. His overall running time of 00:36:06 was 01:03 slower than the average, indicating that he could benefit from focusing on improving his running performance. This suggests that he may have a stronger profile in terms of strength and could benefit from incorporating more running training into his routine.
In conclusion, Alejandro Alcolea Lozano had a strong performance in the 2023 Madrid Hyrox race, finishing in the top 9% of athletes. To further enhance his performance, he should focus on improving his running performance, particularly by incorporating interval training, building strength and power for the sled push segment, improving cardiovascular endurance and upper body strength for the ski erg segment, and working on increasing running speed and endurance for the second running segment. Implementing pacing strategies, refining transitions, and developing mental resilience will also contribute to his overall performance improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Murdoch Graeme | 2024 Manchester | 01:10:53 | |
| Sternad Thomas | 2023 München | 01:10:49 | |
| Zitkus Ryan | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:11:09 | |
| Colombini Andrea | 2024 Milan | 01:11:07 | |
| Sisson Gavin | 2023 Glasgow | 01:10:29 | |
| Smith Ben | 2023 Glasgow | 01:11:16 | |
| Van Der Louw Pim | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:11:05 | |
| Valøen Oddvar Inge | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:11:08 | |
| Fradier Henri | 2024 Paris | 01:10:31 | |
| Mareschal Papi | 2024 Marseille | 01:11:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Barcelona | 01:05:35 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
