Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:38 (From 47:29 to 44:51) | 55.4% |
| Sled Pull | 01:04 (From 06:17 to 05:13) | 22.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:35 (From 06:01 to 05:26) | 12.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:21 (From 07:16 to 06:55) | 7.4% |
| BBJ | 00:07 (From 05:52 to 05:45) | 2.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:18 to 04:18) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 01:43 to 01:43) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:51 to 04:51) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:09 to 02:09) | 0.0% |
| Ruddick Stuart | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:36 | 00:00 | 04:51 +00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 05:36 | 04:33 -00:15 | 04:51 +00:45 |
| Running 2 | 05:22 | 09:54 | 05:19 +00:03 | 09:24 +00:30 |
| Sled Push | 01:43 | 15:16 | 03:08 -01:25 | 14:43 +00:33 |
| Running 3 | 05:20 | 16:59 | 05:46 -00:26 | 17:51 -00:52 |
| Sled Pull | 06:17 | 22:19 | 05:25 +00:52 | 23:37 -01:18 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 28:36 | 05:46 +00:01 | 29:02 -00:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:52 | 34:23 | 06:00 -00:08 | 34:48 -00:25 |
| Running 5 | 06:09 | 40:15 | 05:58 +00:11 | 40:48 -00:33 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 46:24 | 04:58 -00:07 | 46:46 -00:22 |
| Running 6 | 05:57 | 51:15 | 05:49 +00:08 | 51:44 -00:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 57:12 | 02:22 -00:13 | 57:33 -00:21 |
| Running 7 | 06:00 | 59:21 | 05:47 +00:13 | 59:55 -00:34 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:01 | 01:05:21 | 05:37 +00:24 | 01:05:42 -00:21 |
| Running 8 | 07:22 | 01:11:22 | 06:35 +00:47 | 01:11:19 +00:03 |
| Wall Balls | 07:16 | 01:18:44 | 07:15 +00:01 | 01:17:54 +00:50 |
| Roxzone | 07:05 | 01:32:55 | 07:46 -00:41 | 01:32:55 |
Stuart Ruddick delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, ranking in the top 42% overall and in the top 46% within his age group. His total running time was slightly slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in this area. Notably, Stuart excelled in strength-based segments such as the Sled Push and Ski Erg, which suggests a strong strength profile. However, his running performance lagged behind, affirming the need to focus more on running to balance his hybrid capabilities.
In terms of pacing, Stuart started slower than average in the initial running segments but maintained a consistent pace throughout the race. This indicates he may benefit from a more aggressive start to gain a time advantage early on.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ware Zach | 2022 Dallas | 01:33:14 | |
| Dominguez Ian | 2022 Dallas | 01:32:53 | |
| Cheung Calvin | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:32:50 | |
| Teyssedre Geoffrey | 2024 Köln | 01:33:16 | |
| Bernard Brian | 2024 Glasgow | 01:32:39 | |
| Lazzaro Dario | 2024 Rimini | 01:32:27 | |
| Minter Jordan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:32:29 | |
| Viehhauser Konstantin | 2023 Hamburg | 01:33:04 | |
| James Cameron | 2024 Malaga | 01:32:46 | |
| Stuhlmacher Moritz | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:33:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Ruddick Stuart
