Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nicholson Scott's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nicholson Scott's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nicholson Scott's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nicholson Scott's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:58 | 06:27 to 05:29 | 51.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:25 | 02:36 to 02:11 | 22.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:19 | 05:19 to 05:00 | 16.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:11 | 05:24 to 05:13 | 9.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:44 to 02:44 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:14 to 06:14 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:16 to 43:16 | 0.0% |
| Nicholson Scott | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:22 | 00:00 | 04:46 +00:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 05:22 | 04:31 -00:03 | 04:46 +00:36 |
| Running 2 | 04:35 | 09:50 | 05:07 -00:32 | 09:17 +00:33 |
| Sled Push | 02:44 | 14:25 | 03:04 -00:20 | 14:24 +00:01 |
| Running 3 | 04:58 | 17:09 | 05:36 -00:38 | 17:28 -00:19 |
| Sled Pull | 05:19 | 22:07 | 05:13 +00:06 | 23:04 -00:57 |
| Running 4 | 08:00 | 27:26 | 05:36 +02:24 | 28:17 -00:51 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:27 | 35:26 | 05:42 +00:45 | 33:53 +01:33 |
| Running 5 | 05:05 | 41:53 | 05:47 -00:42 | 39:35 +02:18 |
| Rowing | 04:36 | 46:58 | 04:54 -00:18 | 45:22 +01:36 |
| Running 6 | 05:04 | 51:34 | 05:36 -00:32 | 50:16 +01:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:36 | 56:38 | 02:17 +00:19 | 55:52 +00:46 |
| Running 7 | 05:04 | 59:14 | 05:36 -00:32 | 58:09 +01:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:24 | 01:04:18 | 05:26 -00:02 | 01:03:45 +00:33 |
| Running 8 | 05:11 | 01:09:42 | 06:17 -01:06 | 01:09:11 +00:31 |
| Wall Balls | 06:14 | 01:14:53 | 06:55 -00:41 | 01:15:28 -00:35 |
| Roxzone | 08:48 | 01:29:47 | 07:24 +01:24 | 01:29:47 |
Scott Nicholson demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Perth Hyrox race, finishing in the top 41% overall and 51% in his age group. His overall time of 01:29:47 is impressive, with his total running time of 00:43:16 being 1:28 minutes faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. Scott showed exceptional running capability, especially in segments like Running 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8, all of which were significantly faster than average. However, his performance in Running 4 suggests he might have started too fast, leading to a slower pace in the middle of the race. Transition times (Roxzone) and some strength elements like Burpees Broad Jump and Sled Pull also indicate areas for improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kwint Thomas | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:29:23 | |
| Rief Patrick | 2019 Hamburg | 01:30:12 | |
| Mao Jason | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:29:21 | |
| Calmon Martin | 2022 Birmingham | 01:29:27 | |
| Walmsley Ike | 2024 Manchester | 01:29:40 | |
| Anthony Daniel | 2024 Dallas | 01:29:22 | |
| Folgado Rubio David | 2022 Valencia | 01:29:30 | |
| Henderson John | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:29:42 | |
| Cunningham Conal | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:29:44 | |
| Davies Duncan | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:30:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:28:30 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
