Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Martin Connor's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Martin Connor's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Martin Connor's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Martin Connor's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rowing | 02:55 | 07:38 to 04:43 | 69.7% |
| Run Total | 00:54 | 42:13 to 41:19 | 21.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:22 | 06:20 to 05:58 | 8.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:45 to 03:45 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Martin Connor | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:45 | 00:00 | 04:34 +00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 04:45 | 04:25 -00:12 | 04:34 +00:11 |
| Running 2 | 04:38 | 08:58 | 04:54 -00:16 | 08:59 -00:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:06 | 13:36 | 02:52 -00:46 | 13:53 -00:17 |
| Running 3 | 05:12 | 15:42 | 05:21 -00:09 | 16:45 -01:03 |
| Sled Pull | 03:45 | 20:54 | 04:51 -01:06 | 22:06 -01:12 |
| Running 4 | 05:25 | 24:39 | 05:19 +00:06 | 26:57 -02:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:45 | 30:04 | 05:13 -00:28 | 32:16 -02:12 |
| Running 5 | 05:25 | 34:49 | 05:29 -00:04 | 37:29 -02:40 |
| Rowing | 07:38 | 40:14 | 04:47 +02:51 | 42:58 -02:44 |
| Running 6 | 05:40 | 47:52 | 05:21 +00:19 | 47:45 +00:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 53:32 | 02:08 -00:17 | 53:06 +00:26 |
| Running 7 | 05:27 | 55:23 | 05:19 +00:08 | 55:14 +00:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:14 | 01:00:50 | 05:00 -00:46 | 01:00:33 +00:17 |
| Running 8 | 05:43 | 01:05:04 | 05:55 -00:12 | 01:05:33 -00:29 |
| Wall Balls | 06:20 | 01:10:47 | 06:22 -00:02 | 01:11:28 -00:41 |
| Roxzone | 07:31 | 01:24:32 | 06:42 +00:49 | 01:24:32 |
Connor Martin delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Perth Hyrox event, achieving an overall rank of 231, placing him in the top 33% of participants, and the top 41% within his age group. Notably, his total running time of 00:42:13 was 00:21 faster than the average, indicating a strong running capability. This suggests that Connor has a runner profile and should focus on enhancing his strength for a more balanced performance. During the race, Connor's pacing exhibited a slight tendency to start conservatively, as seen in his first running lap being slower than average, but he managed to maintain a strong and consistent pace throughout subsequent running segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gudmundsson Christoffer | 2023 Malmö | 01:24:21 | |
| Witt Wolfgang | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:24:28 | |
| Cartwright Neil | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:20 | |
| Bardell George | 2023 Manchester | 01:24:46 | |
| Furber Matthew | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:24:41 | |
| Burlinchon Fabien | 2023 Paris | 01:24:12 | |
| Fuller Jon | 2023 London | 01:25:02 | |
| Speechley Stuart | 2023 Glasgow | 01:24:23 | |
| Halse Ed | 2023 London | 01:24:31 | |
| Dinsdale Sam | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
