Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 394 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Latchem Martin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Latchem Martin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Latchem Martin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Latchem Martin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 10:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 04:19 | 14:11 to 09:52 | 39.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:01 | 11:28 to 07:27 | 36.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:33 | 10:39 to 08:06 | 23.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:05 to 03:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:43 to 06:43 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 50:48 to 50:48 | 0.0% |
| Latchem Martin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:48 | 00:00 | 05:32 +01:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:53 | 06:48 | 04:55 -00:02 | 05:32 +01:16 |
| Running 2 | 05:49 | 11:41 | 06:22 -00:33 | 10:27 +01:14 |
| Sled Push | 03:05 | 17:30 | 03:59 -00:54 | 16:49 +00:41 |
| Running 3 | 06:00 | 20:35 | 07:10 -01:10 | 20:48 -00:13 |
| Sled Pull | 06:43 | 26:35 | 07:07 -00:24 | 27:58 -01:23 |
| Running 4 | 06:13 | 33:18 | 07:09 -00:56 | 35:05 -01:47 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:39 | 39:31 | 08:19 +02:20 | 42:14 -02:43 |
| Running 5 | 06:31 | 50:10 | 07:38 -01:07 | 50:33 -00:23 |
| Rowing | 05:07 | 56:41 | 05:33 -00:26 | 58:11 -01:30 |
| Running 6 | 06:09 | 01:01:48 | 07:14 -01:05 | 01:03:44 -01:56 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 01:07:57 | 02:57 -00:52 | 01:10:58 -03:01 |
| Running 7 | 06:07 | 01:10:02 | 07:16 -01:09 | 01:13:55 -03:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 11:28 | 01:16:09 | 07:57 +03:31 | 01:21:11 -05:02 |
| Running 8 | 07:15 | 01:27:37 | 09:18 -02:03 | 01:29:08 -01:31 |
| Wall Balls | 14:11 | 01:34:52 | 09:58 +04:13 | 01:38:26 -03:34 |
| Roxzone | 10:36 | 01:59:32 | 11:08 -00:32 | 01:59:32 |
Martin Latchem competed well in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX Race, finishing in the top 63% of the total athletes. He particularly excelled at running, with his total running time being 07:01 minutes faster than the average. Martin's performance was particularly strong during the first four running segments, where he started slower than average but consistently improved his pace. This indicates he has a strong endurance base which allowed him to maintain a fast pace throughout the race.
However, there are areas where improvement can take Martin's performance to a higher level. His slower performance in the Roxzone indicates a need for improvements in overall fitness and transition times. Furthermore, he struggled in some strength-oriented exercises like Wall Balls, Sandbag Lunges, and Burpees Broad Jump, indicating a potential need to focus more on strength training.
Martin should consider implementing the following strategies in future races to improve his performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Qadiri Yussuf | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:59:24 | |
| Sageloli Romain | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:59:05 | |
| Katako Chris | 2023 London | 01:59:53 | |
| Watson Nick | 2023 Birmingham | 01:59:51 | |
| Ivory Ronan | 2024 Madrid | 01:59:21 | |
| Maimone Christopher | 2021 New York | 01:59:07 | |
| Toor Kamaljeet | 2024 London | 01:59:12 | |
| Savill Matt | 2024 London | 01:59:16 | |
| Etheridge Thomas | 2023 London | 01:59:48 | |
| Peters Falk | 2023 Hamburg | 01:59:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:55:06 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
