Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:30 (From 52:43 to 47:13) | 71.7% |
| BBJ | 01:59 (From 08:19 to 06:20) | 25.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:11 (From 03:29 to 03:18) | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:31 to 04:31) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 04:02 to 04:02) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:53 to 04:53) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 01:57 to 01:57) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 05:49 to 05:49) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 06:29 to 06:29) | 0.0% |
| De Vries Mc | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:27 | 00:00 | 05:06 -00:39 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 04:27 | 04:38 -00:07 | 05:06 -00:39 |
| Running 2 | 06:19 | 08:58 | 05:32 +00:47 | 09:44 -00:46 |
| Sled Push | 03:29 | 15:17 | 03:21 +00:08 | 15:16 +00:01 |
| Running 3 | 06:28 | 18:46 | 06:05 +00:23 | 18:37 +00:09 |
| Sled Pull | 04:02 | 25:14 | 05:49 -01:47 | 24:42 +00:32 |
| Running 4 | 06:38 | 29:16 | 06:02 +00:36 | 30:31 -01:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:19 | 35:54 | 06:35 +01:44 | 36:33 -00:39 |
| Running 5 | 06:57 | 44:13 | 06:18 +00:39 | 43:08 +01:05 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 51:10 | 05:06 -00:13 | 49:26 +01:44 |
| Running 6 | 07:03 | 56:03 | 06:08 +00:55 | 54:32 +01:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 01:03:06 | 02:30 -00:33 | 01:00:40 +02:26 |
| Running 7 | 07:04 | 01:05:03 | 06:04 +01:00 | 01:03:10 +01:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:49 | 01:12:07 | 06:10 -00:21 | 01:09:14 +02:53 |
| Running 8 | 07:50 | 01:17:56 | 07:03 +00:47 | 01:15:24 +02:32 |
| Wall Balls | 06:29 | 01:25:46 | 07:54 -01:25 | 01:22:27 +03:19 |
| Roxzone | 06:44 | 01:38:51 | 08:30 -01:46 | 01:38:51 |
Mc De Vries delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, finishing with an overall rank of 1758 out of 3118 participants, placing him within the top 56%. In his age group (30-34), he ranked 418, situating him in the top 62%. His overall time was 01:38:51, with a total running time of 00:52:43, which was 04:02 slower than the average. This indicates a need for improvement in running efficiency. Mc De Vries exhibits a strong hybrid profile, with notable strengths in both strength-based exercises and certain running segments. However, his pacing strategy appears to be inconsistent; he started strong in the initial running segments but gradually slowed down, suggesting a potential pacing issue.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Uhlig Nicolas | 2023 München | 01:38:55 | |
| Sockeel Quentin | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:39:04 | |
| Philippi Andrew | 2022 Chicago | 01:39:09 | |
| Heiter Philipp | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:38:22 | |
| Chilton Jordan | 2023 Manchester | 01:38:58 | |
| Ward Clint | 2023 London | 01:38:55 | |
| Noijons Simon | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:38:30 | |
| Paterson Mark | 2024 Glasgow | 01:38:42 | |
| To Paul | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:38:37 | |
| Alvarez Jose | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:38:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
De Vries Mc
