Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Wetering Stenzen Milou's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Wetering Stenzen Milou's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Wetering Stenzen Milou's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Wetering Stenzen Milou's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:09 | 49:04 to 43:55 | 79.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:18 | 06:47 to 05:29 | 20.0% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:15 to 05:12 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 02:59 to 02:59 | 0.0% |
| Van Wetering Stenzen Milou | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:42 | 00:00 | 05:00 +00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 05:42 | 05:03 -00:07 | 05:00 +00:42 |
| Running 2 | 05:43 | 10:38 | 05:21 +00:22 | 10:03 +00:35 |
| Sled Push | 01:59 | 16:21 | 02:39 -00:40 | 15:24 +00:57 |
| Running 3 | 06:06 | 18:20 | 05:37 +00:29 | 18:03 +00:17 |
| Sled Pull | 04:39 | 24:26 | 05:35 -00:56 | 23:40 +00:46 |
| Running 4 | 06:24 | 29:05 | 05:40 +00:44 | 29:15 -00:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:47 | 35:29 | 05:50 +00:57 | 34:55 +00:34 |
| Running 5 | 06:22 | 42:16 | 05:48 +00:34 | 40:45 +01:31 |
| Rowing | 05:15 | 48:38 | 05:19 -00:04 | 46:33 +02:05 |
| Running 6 | 06:04 | 53:53 | 05:42 +00:22 | 51:52 +02:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 59:57 | 02:12 -00:21 | 57:34 +02:23 |
| Running 7 | 06:08 | 01:01:48 | 05:41 +00:27 | 59:46 +02:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:13 | 01:07:56 | 04:36 -00:23 | 01:05:27 +02:29 |
| Running 8 | 06:38 | 01:12:09 | 06:03 +00:35 | 01:10:03 +02:06 |
| Wall Balls | 02:59 | 01:18:47 | 04:45 -01:46 | 01:16:06 +02:41 |
| Roxzone | 05:51 | 01:27:29 | 06:38 -00:47 | 01:27:29 |
Based on the splits analysis, Milou's total running time of 00:49:04 was 05:25 slower than the average for her finish time. This suggests that she could benefit from improving her overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, her best running lap of 00:05:42 indicates that she has the potential to excel in running if she focuses on strengthening this aspect of her performance.
In conclusion, Milou Van Wetering Stenzen performed well in the 2024 Maastricht Hyrox race, but there are areas where she can improve to enhance her performance. By focusing on improving her overall fitness, running speed, and transition time, she can become a stronger athlete in future races. Incorporating specific exercises, drills, and training routines tailored to her weaknesses will help her reach her full potential.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Maggott Emma | 2023 London | 01:27:15 | |
| Bchner Maike | 2023 München | 01:27:00 | |
| Nicham Regina | 2023 Wien | 01:27:03 | |
| Starz Hanna | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:27:26 | |
| Mills Maxine | 2023 London | 01:27:16 | |
| Benedek Martina | 2023 Wien | 01:27:52 | |
| Devittorio Victoria | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:27:04 | |
| Sloth Stine | 2023 Hamburg | 01:27:11 | |
| Knight Holly | 2022 Chicago | 01:27:18 | |
| Roth Nolwenn | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:27:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
