Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Der Tuin Jason's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Der Tuin Jason's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Der Tuin Jason's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Der Tuin Jason's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:59 | 44:39 to 42:40 | 52.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:13 | 07:32 to 06:19 | 32.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:33 | 03:22 to 02:49 | 14.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:28 to 04:26 | 0.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:38 to 01:38 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Van Der Tuin Jason | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:07 | 00:00 | 04:41 +01:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 06:07 | 04:29 -00:01 | 04:41 +01:26 |
| Running 2 | 05:02 | 10:35 | 05:03 -00:01 | 09:10 +01:25 |
| Sled Push | 03:22 | 15:37 | 02:59 +00:23 | 14:13 +01:24 |
| Running 3 | 05:35 | 18:59 | 05:31 +00:04 | 17:12 +01:47 |
| Sled Pull | 04:30 | 24:34 | 05:05 -00:35 | 22:43 +01:51 |
| Running 4 | 05:33 | 29:04 | 05:29 +00:04 | 27:48 +01:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:59 | 34:37 | 05:32 -00:33 | 33:17 +01:20 |
| Running 5 | 05:30 | 39:36 | 05:41 -00:11 | 38:49 +00:47 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 45:06 | 04:52 -00:09 | 44:30 +00:36 |
| Running 6 | 05:23 | 49:49 | 05:31 -00:08 | 49:22 +00:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:38 | 55:12 | 02:14 -00:36 | 54:53 +00:19 |
| Running 7 | 05:31 | 56:50 | 05:31 +00:00 | 57:07 -00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:08 | 01:02:21 | 05:16 -01:08 | 01:02:38 -00:17 |
| Running 8 | 06:01 | 01:06:29 | 06:09 -00:08 | 01:07:54 -01:25 |
| Wall Balls | 07:32 | 01:12:30 | 06:45 +00:47 | 01:14:03 -01:33 |
| Roxzone | 07:57 | 01:27:53 | 07:05 +00:52 | 01:27:53 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is clear that Jason has a balanced profile between running and strength exercises. His running segments were generally on par with the average, and he even had some faster splits in the later stages of the race. However, his overall running time was 02:43 slower than the average, indicating that he may benefit from focusing on improving his running endurance and speed.
In conclusion, Jason Van Der Tuin had a solid performance in the Hyrox race in Maastricht. To improve his overall performance, he should focus on improving his running endurance and speed, reducing time spent in the Roxzone, and enhancing his performance in specific exercises such as Wall Balls. By implementing the suggested training strategies and race strategies, Jason can continue to improve and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| De Sousa Pascal | 2023 Paris | 01:27:35 | |
| Frank Johannes | 2023 Köln | 01:27:28 | |
| Lumia Sébastien | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:27:29 | |
| Davidian Simon | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:28:07 | |
| Gräuler Philipp | 2023 Hamburg | 01:27:31 | |
| Phelan Andrew | 2024 Dublin | 01:28:10 | |
| Spinelli Luca | 2023 Dubai | 01:28:18 | |
| Romero Ivan | 2023 Miami | 01:28:14 | |
| Ablitzer Rémi | 2024 Madrid | 01:27:25 | |
| Ives Chris | 2023 London | 01:28:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:49:48 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
