Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
196 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 196 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 196 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 196 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
18:19.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 196 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Mark Van Bemmel participated in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race and achieved an overall rank of 2177, placing him in the top 69% of all athletes, and 441st in his age group, putting him in the top 70% for his category. His overall time was 02:09:16. While Mark showed strength in various exercise zones like the Sled Pull and Sandbag Lunges, his total running time was 01:14:51, which is 10:32 slower than the average, indicating a potential area for improvement.
Furthermore, analyzing his initial running segments, Mark started the race with a fast pace, evident from his Running 1 being 01:10 faster than average (9th percentile rank). However, his pace significantly dropped in later running segments, suggesting that he may have started too quickly and was unable to maintain that speed. Mark can be categorized as having a hybrid profile, with a need to improve endurance in longer running segments while maintaining his strength in exercise zones.
Segments to Improve
Total Running Time: Given that Mark's total running time was significantly slower than the average, focusing on endurance and pacing is crucial. Training Strategies:
Long-Distance Runs: Incorporate longer runs at a steady pace into the weekly routine to build endurance.
Interval Training: Short bursts of high-intensity running followed by rest or low-intensity periods to improve speed and cardiovascular capacity.
Hill Repeats: Running up and down hills to build both strength and endurance.
Burpees Broad Jump: This segment was slower than average by 00:30, indicating room for improvement. Training Strategies:
Plyometric Drills: Incorporate box jumps and squat jumps to improve explosive power.
Core Strengthening: Engage in planks and Russian twists to enhance core stability, crucial for efficient burpees.
Technique Refinement: Focus on form, ensuring proper technique to reduce fatigue and increase efficiency.
Race Strategies
Start at a Sustainable Pace: Avoid starting the race too quickly to conserve energy for later segments. Utilize negative splits, where the second half of the race is faster than the first.
Optimize Transition Times: Though Mark's roxzone time was faster than average, continued focus on swift transitions can further enhance overall performance.
Hydration and Nutrition: Ensure adequate hydration and nutrition before and during the race to maintain energy levels, especially during longer running segments.
Visualize the Race: Mentally prepare by visualizing the race course, transitions, and each exercise zone to enhance focus and execution during the event.