Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 644 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Beek Pieternel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Beek Pieternel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Beek Pieternel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Beek Pieternel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:57. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:27 | 39:49 to 37:22 | 49.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:56 | 04:55 to 03:59 | 18.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:35 | 05:10 to 04:35 | 11.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:23 | 02:15 to 01:52 | 7.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:14 | 03:19 to 03:05 | 4.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:12 | 03:36 to 03:24 | 4.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 01:52 to 01:42 | 3.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:48 to 03:48 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Van Beek Pieternel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:05 | 00:00 | 04:25 +00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:10 | 05:05 | 04:47 +00:23 | 04:25 +00:40 |
| Running 2 | 04:40 | 10:15 | 04:39 +00:01 | 09:12 +01:03 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 14:55 | 02:19 -00:04 | 13:51 +01:04 |
| Running 3 | 04:45 | 17:10 | 04:53 -00:08 | 16:10 +01:00 |
| Sled Pull | 03:48 | 21:55 | 04:35 -00:47 | 21:03 +00:52 |
| Running 4 | 04:54 | 25:43 | 04:54 +00:00 | 25:38 +00:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:55 | 30:37 | 04:33 +00:22 | 30:32 +00:05 |
| Running 5 | 05:06 | 35:32 | 04:59 +00:07 | 35:05 +00:27 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 40:38 | 04:59 -00:16 | 40:04 +00:34 |
| Running 6 | 04:58 | 45:21 | 04:55 +00:03 | 45:03 +00:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:52 | 50:19 | 01:56 -00:04 | 49:58 +00:21 |
| Running 7 | 04:58 | 52:11 | 04:54 +00:04 | 51:54 +00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:36 | 57:09 | 03:45 -00:09 | 56:48 +00:21 |
| Running 8 | 05:26 | 01:00:45 | 05:08 +00:18 | 01:00:33 +00:12 |
| Wall Balls | 03:19 | 01:06:11 | 03:44 -00:25 | 01:05:41 +00:30 |
| Roxzone | 05:12 | 01:14:33 | 05:08 +00:04 | 01:14:33 |
In terms of her splits, Pieternel showed consistent performance across most segments, with some areas for improvement. Her total running time of 00:39:49 was 01:43 slower than average. This suggests that she may need to focus on improving her overall fitness and transition time to decrease her time spent in the roxzone.
In conclusion, Pieternel Van Beek had a strong performance in the 2024 Maastricht Hyrox race. While she showed excellence in many segments, there are areas for improvement, such as running, burpees broad jump, ski erg, and transition time. By implementing specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, plyometric exercises, and endurance training, Pieternel can enhance her performance in these areas and further excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Catalano Hanna | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:14:11 | |
| Former Karina | 2023 Paris | 01:14:49 | |
| Waanders Alyssa | 2024 Melbourne | 01:14:41 | |
| Booker Kristin | 2023 Chicago | 01:14:40 | |
| Dunne Hayley | 2024 Perth | 01:15:03 | |
| Cheong Jd | 2023 Singapore | 01:14:09 | |
| Burt Lisa | 2022 London | 01:14:27 | |
| Tetley Alex | 2022 London | 01:14:30 | |
| Snowdon Anita | 2023 London | 01:15:02 | |
| KrierFrank Luisa | 2024 Berlin | 01:14:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
