Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 418 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Naumann Duncan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Naumann Duncan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Naumann Duncan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Naumann Duncan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:54. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:02 | 09:29 to 07:27 | 41.5% |
| Run Total | 01:11 | 56:02 to 54:51 | 24.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:43 | 03:44 to 03:01 | 14.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:30 | 07:32 to 07:02 | 10.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:21 | 05:18 to 04:57 | 7.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:07 | 08:13 to 08:06 | 2.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:29 to 05:29 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:20 to 08:20 | 0.0% |
| Naumann Duncan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:18 | 00:00 | 05:34 +00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:18 | 06:18 | 04:55 +00:23 | 05:34 +00:44 |
| Running 2 | 05:53 | 11:36 | 06:23 -00:30 | 10:29 +01:07 |
| Sled Push | 04:08 | 17:29 | 03:57 +00:11 | 16:52 +00:37 |
| Running 3 | 06:11 | 21:37 | 07:07 -00:56 | 20:49 +00:48 |
| Sled Pull | 07:32 | 27:48 | 07:02 +00:30 | 27:56 -00:08 |
| Running 4 | 06:14 | 35:20 | 07:07 -00:53 | 34:58 +00:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:13 | 41:34 | 08:19 -00:06 | 42:05 -00:31 |
| Running 5 | 06:59 | 49:47 | 07:35 -00:36 | 50:24 -00:37 |
| Rowing | 05:29 | 56:46 | 05:32 -00:03 | 57:59 -01:13 |
| Running 6 | 07:08 | 01:02:15 | 07:16 -00:08 | 01:03:31 -01:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:44 | 01:09:23 | 02:56 +00:48 | 01:10:47 -01:24 |
| Running 7 | 07:25 | 01:13:07 | 07:14 +00:11 | 01:13:43 -00:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 09:29 | 01:20:32 | 07:54 +01:35 | 01:20:57 -00:25 |
| Running 8 | 09:59 | 01:30:01 | 09:22 +00:37 | 01:28:51 +01:10 |
| Wall Balls | 08:20 | 01:40:00 | 09:52 -01:32 | 01:38:13 +01:47 |
| Roxzone | 10:55 | 01:59:05 | 11:00 -00:05 | 01:59:05 |
Naumann's total running time of 00:56:02 is 01:00 slower than the average, indicating that he may need to improve his overall fitness and transition time. His best running lap was 00:05:53, which is a strong performance.
Naumann should also consider incorporating more strength training into his routine to improve his overall fitness and performance. This can help with both the running segments and the strength-focused exercises in the race. Additionally, he should work on his mental toughness and focus to push through the more challenging segments of the race.
Overall, with targeted training and improved race strategies, Naumann has the potential to enhance his performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rich Brian | 2023 Dallas | 01:59:27 | |
| Ventre Michael | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:58:58 | |
| 彭 晓新 | 2024 Beijing | 01:59:07 | |
| Ortega Gabriel | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:59:10 | |
| Paniagua Ashtar | 2023 New York | 01:59:31 | |
| Chua Wee Soon | 2024 Taipei | 01:59:25 | |
| Baskovich Sebastian | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:59:26 | |
| Wübbe Lennart | 2022 Bremen | 01:58:38 | |
| Mattsson Brunn Pontus | 2024 Stockholm | 01:59:07 | |
| Toor Kamaljeet | 2024 London | 01:59:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 02:07:08 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
