Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lamb James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lamb James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lamb James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lamb James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 00:41 | 05:21 to 04:40 | 25.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:34 | 03:17 to 02:43 | 21.1% |
| Run Total | 00:31 | 42:20 to 41:49 | 19.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:21 | 05:23 to 05:02 | 13.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:18 | 02:21 to 02:03 | 11.2% |
| Rowing | 00:16 | 05:00 to 04:44 | 9.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:47 to 05:47 | 0.0% |
| Lamb James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:12 | 00:00 | 04:37 +00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 05:12 | 04:27 -00:07 | 04:37 +00:35 |
| Running 2 | 04:42 | 09:32 | 04:59 -00:17 | 09:04 +00:28 |
| Sled Push | 03:17 | 14:14 | 02:55 +00:22 | 14:03 +00:11 |
| Running 3 | 05:11 | 17:31 | 05:25 -00:14 | 16:58 +00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 05:21 | 22:42 | 04:59 +00:22 | 22:23 +00:19 |
| Running 4 | 05:28 | 28:03 | 05:24 +00:04 | 27:22 +00:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:23 | 33:31 | 05:20 +00:03 | 32:46 +00:45 |
| Running 5 | 05:36 | 38:54 | 05:34 +00:02 | 38:06 +00:48 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 44:30 | 04:49 +00:11 | 43:40 +00:50 |
| Running 6 | 05:18 | 49:30 | 05:26 -00:08 | 48:29 +01:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 54:48 | 02:11 +00:10 | 53:55 +00:53 |
| Running 7 | 05:14 | 57:09 | 05:24 -00:10 | 56:06 +01:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:46 | 01:02:23 | 05:06 -00:20 | 01:01:30 +00:53 |
| Running 8 | 05:43 | 01:07:09 | 06:02 -00:19 | 01:06:36 +00:33 |
| Wall Balls | 05:47 | 01:12:52 | 06:33 -00:46 | 01:12:38 +00:14 |
| Roxzone | 07:36 | 01:26:06 | 06:55 +00:41 | 01:26:06 |
James Lamb displayed a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox Race, finishing in the top 34% Overall and top 40% within his age group (30-34). His overall time was 01:26:06, which displays his stamina and endurance. James exhibited particular strength in running, with a total running time of 00:42:20, which was 00:50 faster than the average. His best running lap was 00:04:42.
An analysis of his performance shows that he started slower than the average pace in the first running segment but managed to pick up speed and maintain a consistent pace in the subsequent running segments. This suggests that James might have a hybrid profile, being good at both running and strength.
James should consider implementing the following strategies for better performance in future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cowell Josh | 2024 Brisbane | 01:26:16 | |
| Bohn Tobias | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:25:44 | |
| Vucinac Stefan | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:26:27 | |
| Wilks Ashley | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:52 | |
| Siemonsma Simon | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:25:53 | |
| Pereira João | 2024 Madrid | 01:25:50 | |
| Martin Terrance | 2023 Birmingham | 01:26:29 | |
| Hesse John | 2023 Melbourne | 01:26:31 | |
| García Morales Daniel Isai | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:26:22 | |
| Demagistri Andrea | 2024 Turin | 01:25:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:19:50 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
