Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 787 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Koek Sander's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Koek Sander's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Koek Sander's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Koek Sander's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:45 | 58:56 to 51:11 | 92.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:36 | 05:25 to 04:49 | 7.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:38 to 03:38 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:13 to 07:13 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:42 to 02:42 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:38 to 05:38 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:49 to 06:49 | 0.0% |
| Koek Sander | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:00 | 00:00 | 05:20 +01:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:25 | 07:00 | 04:46 +00:39 | 05:20 +01:40 |
| Running 2 | 06:11 | 12:25 | 06:00 +00:11 | 10:06 +02:19 |
| Sled Push | 03:38 | 18:36 | 03:42 -00:04 | 16:06 +02:30 |
| Running 3 | 06:18 | 22:14 | 06:36 -00:18 | 19:48 +02:26 |
| Sled Pull | 04:33 | 28:32 | 06:28 -01:55 | 26:24 +02:08 |
| Running 4 | 06:31 | 33:05 | 06:36 -00:05 | 32:52 +00:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:13 | 39:36 | 07:25 -00:12 | 39:28 +00:08 |
| Running 5 | 07:34 | 46:49 | 06:56 +00:38 | 46:53 -00:04 |
| Rowing | 05:07 | 54:23 | 05:19 -00:12 | 53:49 +00:34 |
| Running 6 | 07:21 | 59:30 | 06:41 +00:40 | 59:08 +00:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:42 | 01:06:51 | 02:41 +00:01 | 01:05:49 +01:02 |
| Running 7 | 08:01 | 01:09:33 | 06:43 +01:18 | 01:08:30 +01:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:38 | 01:17:34 | 07:00 -01:22 | 01:15:13 +02:21 |
| Running 8 | 10:03 | 01:23:12 | 08:09 +01:54 | 01:22:13 +00:59 |
| Wall Balls | 06:49 | 01:33:15 | 09:02 -02:13 | 01:30:22 +02:53 |
| Roxzone | 09:16 | 01:49:12 | 09:48 -00:32 | 01:49:12 |
Pacing:
Based on the splits analysis, Sander's pacing was generally consistent throughout the race. However, it is worth noting that his total running time of 00:58:56 was 08:24 slower than the average. This suggests that he may benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time in order to reduce the time spent in the Roxzone.
Profile:
Sander's total running time of 00:58:56 was slower than the average, indicating that he may need to focus more on his running training. While he had some strong running segments, such as Running 2 and Running 4, there is room for improvement in other segments.
In summary, Sander Koek's performance in the Hyrox race in Maastricht was commendable. By focusing on improving his running performance, particularly in the identified segments, and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can enhance his overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kopmels Noah | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:48:55 | |
| Encarnacion Ken Adrian | 2024 Taipei | 01:48:46 | |
| Garcia Martin Carlos | 2024 Madrid | 01:49:29 | |
| Tsui Chuen Ming | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:49:36 | |
| Sperling Philip | 2018 Hamburg | 01:49:34 | |
| Taylor Ross | 2023 London | 01:49:32 | |
| Raggi Jonathan | 2023 Milan | 01:49:11 | |
| Ching Zero | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:49:04 | |
| Blackman Adrian | 2023 Birmingham | 01:48:54 | |
| Collins Matthew | 2023 London | 01:49:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:56:15 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:48:45 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
