Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 555 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Els Kevin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Els Kevin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Els Kevin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Els Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 13:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 13:41 | 01:06:44 to 53:03 | 98.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 05:02 to 04:53 | 1.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:04 to 03:04 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:36 to 03:36 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:56 to 06:56 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:38 to 06:38 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Els Kevin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:15 | 00:00 | 05:36 +01:39 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:02 | 07:15 | 04:52 +00:10 | 05:36 +01:39 |
| Running 2 | 07:39 | 12:17 | 06:15 +01:24 | 10:28 +01:49 |
| Sled Push | 03:04 | 19:56 | 03:49 -00:45 | 16:43 +03:13 |
| Running 3 | 08:12 | 23:00 | 06:59 +01:13 | 20:32 +02:28 |
| Sled Pull | 03:36 | 31:12 | 06:41 -03:05 | 27:31 +03:41 |
| Running 4 | 07:27 | 34:48 | 06:56 +00:31 | 34:12 +00:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:56 | 42:15 | 07:56 -01:00 | 41:08 +01:07 |
| Running 5 | 08:28 | 49:11 | 07:20 +01:08 | 49:04 +00:07 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 57:39 | 05:25 -00:41 | 56:24 +01:15 |
| Running 6 | 07:47 | 01:02:23 | 07:01 +00:46 | 01:01:49 +00:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:14 | 01:10:10 | 02:52 -00:38 | 01:08:50 +01:20 |
| Running 7 | 07:59 | 01:12:24 | 07:03 +00:56 | 01:11:42 +00:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:38 | 01:20:23 | 07:14 -00:36 | 01:18:45 +01:38 |
| Running 8 | 12:00 | 01:27:01 | 08:50 +03:10 | 01:25:59 +01:02 |
| Wall Balls | 05:14 | 01:39:01 | 09:31 -04:17 | 01:34:49 +04:12 |
| Roxzone | 10:56 | 01:55:04 | 10:44 +00:12 | 01:55:04 |
In terms of his splits analysis, Kevin's total running time of 01:06:44 was 14:00 slower than average. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap was 00:07:15, which was 01:55 slower than average. This suggests that he may need to work on his running speed and endurance.
Overall, Kevin Els has shown potential in the Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running speed, endurance, and overall fitness, he can enhance his performance and strive for even better results in future races. Incorporating specific training strategies, drills, and exercises tailored to his areas of improvement will be key in reaching his goals.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wegener Bernd | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:55:29 | |
| Bohui Chan | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:55:33 | |
| Smyth Peter | 2024 Glasgow | 01:55:28 | |
| Philipper Thorben | 2022 Essen | 01:54:43 | |
| Fuentes Odei | 2023 Bilbao | 01:55:00 | |
| Shone Lee | 2023 Glasgow | 01:54:37 | |
| Schimank Kay | 2018 Leipzig | 01:54:53 | |
| Raccagni Giovanni | 2024 Milan | 01:55:08 | |
| Graffius Marcus | 2019 Hannover | 01:54:58 | |
| Capps Roland | 2018 Hamburg | 01:54:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
