Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 556 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Davis Rebecca's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Davis Rebecca's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Davis Rebecca's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Davis Rebecca's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:34 | 10:31 to 07:57 | 41.6% |
| Sled Pull | 02:02 | 09:03 to 07:01 | 33.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:38 | 06:06 to 05:28 | 10.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:30 | 07:01 to 06:31 | 8.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:12 | 03:30 to 03:18 | 3.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 02:49 to 02:39 | 2.7% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 05:52 to 05:48 | 1.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:49 to 05:49 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 48:32 to 48:32 | 0.0% |
| Davis Rebecca | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:34 | 00:00 | 05:46 +00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 06:06 | 06:34 | 05:27 +00:39 | 05:46 +00:48 |
| Running 2 | 05:19 | 12:40 | 06:23 -01:04 | 11:13 +01:27 |
| Sled Push | 03:30 | 17:59 | 03:16 +00:14 | 17:36 +00:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:41 | 21:29 | 06:47 -01:06 | 20:52 +00:37 |
| Sled Pull | 09:03 | 27:10 | 07:01 +02:02 | 27:39 -00:29 |
| Running 4 | 06:28 | 36:13 | 06:48 -00:20 | 34:40 +01:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:31 | 42:41 | 08:13 +02:18 | 41:28 +01:13 |
| Running 5 | 06:03 | 53:12 | 07:06 -01:03 | 49:41 +03:31 |
| Rowing | 05:52 | 59:15 | 05:49 +00:03 | 56:47 +02:28 |
| Running 6 | 06:05 | 01:05:07 | 06:57 -00:52 | 01:02:36 +02:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:49 | 01:11:12 | 02:37 +00:12 | 01:09:33 +01:39 |
| Running 7 | 05:54 | 01:14:01 | 06:59 -01:05 | 01:12:10 +01:51 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:49 | 01:19:55 | 06:10 -00:21 | 01:19:09 +00:46 |
| Running 8 | 06:33 | 01:25:44 | 07:48 -01:15 | 01:25:19 +00:25 |
| Wall Balls | 07:01 | 01:32:17 | 06:37 +00:24 | 01:33:07 -00:50 |
| Roxzone | 09:41 | 01:48:49 | 09:05 +00:36 | 01:48:49 |
Rebecca Davis demonstrated a strong performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, finishing in the top 27% of athletes overall and in her age group (30-34). She showcased particular strength in her running abilities, with her total running time being 6:49 faster than average. Rebecca's best running lap was timed at 05:19, highlighting her endurance and speed.
Her performance indicates a clear runner profile, with her running segments consistently outperforming the average times. However, this was balanced with areas of slower performance in the strength-based exercises, suggesting a need for more focused strength training. Her pacing appeared to start slower than average in the initial running segment but picked up speed in later segments, suggesting a need to work on her start speed.
Going forward, Rebecca should consider the following strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hayes Stacey | 2023 Birmingham | 01:49:18 | |
| Mckail Shelagh | 2024 Manchester | 01:48:54 | |
| Yu Qingxia | 2024 New York | 01:48:55 | |
| Garcia Delila | 2020 Chicago | 01:48:46 | |
| Ricciuti Tee | 2023 New York | 01:48:40 | |
| Decker Sarah | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:49:05 | |
| Vining Brittany | 2024 Brisbane | 01:49:16 | |
| Cotton Nicola | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:48:20 | |
| Kanter Madlen | 2022 Berlin | 01:49:17 | |
| Kendall Anna | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:48:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
