Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Brewczynski Cody's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Brewczynski Cody's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Brewczynski Cody's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Brewczynski Cody's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:22 | 05:52 to 04:30 | 34.5% |
| Wall Balls | 01:14 | 06:44 to 05:30 | 31.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:59 | 05:25 to 04:26 | 24.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 02:06 to 01:54 | 5.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:11 | 02:39 to 02:28 | 4.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 37:44 to 37:44 | 0.0% |
| Brewczynski Cody | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:57 | 00:00 | 04:23 +00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:09 | 04:57 | 04:21 -00:12 | 04:23 +00:34 |
| Running 2 | 04:15 | 09:06 | 04:44 -00:29 | 08:44 +00:22 |
| Sled Push | 02:39 | 13:21 | 02:44 -00:05 | 13:28 -00:07 |
| Running 3 | 04:37 | 16:00 | 05:08 -00:31 | 16:12 -00:12 |
| Sled Pull | 03:58 | 20:37 | 04:36 -00:38 | 21:20 -00:43 |
| Running 4 | 04:30 | 24:35 | 05:06 -00:36 | 25:56 -01:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:52 | 29:05 | 04:55 +00:57 | 31:02 -01:57 |
| Running 5 | 04:40 | 34:57 | 05:15 -00:35 | 35:57 -01:00 |
| Rowing | 04:26 | 39:37 | 04:41 -00:15 | 41:12 -01:35 |
| Running 6 | 04:43 | 44:03 | 05:09 -00:26 | 45:53 -01:50 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 48:46 | 02:04 +00:02 | 51:02 -02:16 |
| Running 7 | 04:42 | 50:52 | 05:07 -00:25 | 53:06 -02:14 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:25 | 55:34 | 04:46 +00:39 | 58:13 -02:39 |
| Running 8 | 05:22 | 01:00:59 | 05:36 -00:14 | 01:02:59 -02:00 |
| Wall Balls | 06:44 | 01:06:21 | 05:59 +00:45 | 01:08:35 -02:14 |
| Roxzone | 07:49 | 01:20:48 | 06:14 +01:35 | 01:20:48 |
Cody Brewczynski delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Perth Hyrox race, ranking in the top 26% overall and top 18% within his age group. He demonstrated a strong running profile, with a total running time that was 3:09 minutes faster than the average. This suggests that his running capability is a significant strength. However, his pacing strategy appeared somewhat conservative in the first running segment, as he started 38 seconds slower than average. As the race progressed, Cody significantly improved his running times, showcasing his ability to adapt and accelerate. His strengths lie in running and certain strength exercises, such as the Ski Erg and Sled Pull, where he consistently outperformed the average.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Maroni Lorenzo | 2024 Rimini | 01:20:46 | |
| Blakeley Nick | 2024 London | 01:21:10 | |
| García López Alvaro Jesús | 2023 Bilbao | 01:21:16 | |
| De Wreede Michael | 2024 Maastricht | 01:21:13 | |
| Kelly Seamus | 2024 Malaga | 01:20:53 | |
| Watson Matthew | 2024 Berlin | 01:20:56 | |
| Legros Pierre | 2023 Dubai | 01:21:07 | |
| Macmillan David | 2024 Manchester | 01:21:10 | |
| Serrano Kalel | 2024 Houston | 01:21:11 | |
| Hickey Kyle | 2024 London | 01:20:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
