Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2020 Hannover using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Witt Denis's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Witt Denis's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Witt Denis's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Witt Denis's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:15 | 45:16 to 43:01 | 40.9% |
| Wall Balls | 02:06 | 08:31 to 06:25 | 38.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:27 | 05:32 to 05:05 | 8.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 04:45 to 04:27 | 5.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:16 | 05:09 to 04:53 | 4.8% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:57 to 04:49 | 2.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:30 to 02:30 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:03 to 04:03 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Witt Denis | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:49 | 00:00 | 04:45 +01:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:45 | 05:49 | 04:29 +00:16 | 04:45 +01:04 |
| Running 2 | 05:14 | 10:34 | 05:06 +00:08 | 09:14 +01:20 |
| Sled Push | 02:30 | 15:48 | 03:00 -00:30 | 14:20 +01:28 |
| Running 3 | 05:37 | 18:18 | 05:33 +00:04 | 17:20 +00:58 |
| Sled Pull | 05:09 | 23:55 | 05:08 +00:01 | 22:53 +01:02 |
| Running 4 | 05:55 | 29:04 | 05:33 +00:22 | 28:01 +01:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:03 | 34:59 | 05:37 -01:34 | 33:34 +01:25 |
| Running 5 | 05:35 | 39:02 | 05:43 -00:08 | 39:11 -00:09 |
| Rowing | 04:57 | 44:37 | 04:53 +00:04 | 44:54 -00:17 |
| Running 6 | 05:52 | 49:34 | 05:35 +00:17 | 49:47 -00:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 55:26 | 02:15 -00:15 | 55:22 +00:04 |
| Running 7 | 05:44 | 57:26 | 05:33 +00:11 | 57:37 -00:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:32 | 01:03:10 | 05:23 +00:09 | 01:03:10 +00:00 |
| Running 8 | 05:33 | 01:08:42 | 06:14 -00:41 | 01:08:33 +00:09 |
| Wall Balls | 08:31 | 01:14:15 | 06:49 +01:42 | 01:14:47 -00:32 |
| Roxzone | 06:11 | 01:28:49 | 07:13 -01:02 | 01:28:49 |
Based on his splits analysis, Denis had a strong performance in the Sled Push and Sled Pull segments, where he was faster than the average. He also performed well in the Burpees Broad Jump and Farmers Carry segments, where he gained time compared to the average. However, there were several segments where Denis lost time compared to the average, including Running 1, Ski Erg, Running 2, Running 4, Running 6, and Sandbag Lunges. The segment with the most time lost was the Wall Balls.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tandberg Nicolai Oniyeden M. | 2024 Stockholm | 01:29:05 | |
| Gibbs Darragh | 2024 Glasgow | 01:28:20 | |
| Ramharter Georg | 2018 Wien | 01:28:43 | |
| Guerin Ian | 2024 London | 01:28:47 | |
| Schaap Mart | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:28:35 | |
| Benson Stephen | 2023 Manchester | 01:28:33 | |
| Tabuteau Lilian | 2024 Berlin | 01:28:42 | |
| Kołodziejski Jarosław | 2023 Warschau | 01:28:29 | |
| Trentonzi Italo | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:29:02 | |
| Szeto Samson | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:28:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
