Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mirgorodsky Artem's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mirgorodsky Artem's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mirgorodsky Artem's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mirgorodsky Artem's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:05 | 06:53 to 04:48 | 40.8% |
| Run Total | 01:05 | 37:24 to 36:19 | 21.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:37 | 04:22 to 03:45 | 12.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:20 | 04:27 to 04:07 | 6.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:19 | 04:08 to 03:49 | 6.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:17 | 01:58 to 01:41 | 5.6% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 04:38 to 04:26 | 3.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:11 | 02:21 to 02:10 | 3.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:46 to 03:46 | 0.0% |
| Mirgorodsky Artem | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:53 | 00:00 | 04:07 -00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 03:53 | 04:15 +00:12 | 04:07 -00:14 |
| Running 2 | 04:17 | 08:20 | 04:25 -00:08 | 08:22 -00:02 |
| Sled Push | 02:21 | 12:37 | 02:32 -00:11 | 12:47 -00:10 |
| Running 3 | 04:45 | 14:58 | 04:45 +00:00 | 15:19 -00:21 |
| Sled Pull | 04:22 | 19:43 | 04:09 +00:13 | 20:04 -00:21 |
| Running 4 | 04:46 | 24:05 | 04:44 +00:02 | 24:13 -00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:08 | 28:51 | 04:18 -00:10 | 28:57 -00:06 |
| Running 5 | 04:48 | 32:59 | 04:52 -00:04 | 33:15 -00:16 |
| Rowing | 04:38 | 37:47 | 04:33 +00:05 | 38:07 -00:20 |
| Running 6 | 04:52 | 42:25 | 04:46 +00:06 | 42:40 -00:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 47:17 | 01:54 +00:04 | 47:26 -00:09 |
| Running 7 | 04:49 | 49:15 | 04:45 +00:04 | 49:20 -00:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:46 | 54:04 | 04:16 -00:30 | 54:05 -00:01 |
| Running 8 | 05:17 | 57:50 | 05:06 +00:11 | 58:21 -00:31 |
| Wall Balls | 06:53 | 01:03:07 | 05:22 +01:31 | 01:03:27 -00:20 |
| Roxzone | 04:21 | 01:14:13 | 05:24 -01:03 | 01:14:13 |
His overall time of 01:14:13 indicates a solid performance, with room for improvement in certain areas. His total running time of 00:37:24 was 00:27 slower than the average, suggesting that his transitions may have taken slightly longer than desired. To enhance this segment, Artem should focus on improving his overall fitness and refining his transition time.
The best running lap time of 00:03:53 showcases his speed and agility, surpassing the average by 00:06. This indicates that Artem has a strong running profile and should continue to train and improve his running capabilities.
Overall, Artem Mirgorodsky has shown great potential and skill in the Hyrox race. By targeting specific areas for improvement, such as wall balls, total running time, and ski erg, and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can further enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kiederle Julian | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:13:47 | |
| Breakspear Jordan | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:14:20 | |
| Meikle Darren | 2024 Manchester | 01:14:38 | |
| Plumb Sam | 2023 München | 01:14:21 | |
| Sills Matthew | 2023 London | 01:13:43 | |
| Bustamante Diego | 2024 Bilbao | 01:14:24 | |
| Bunch Clint | 2024 Cape Town | 01:13:54 | |
| Mcgowan Mark | 2024 Birmingham | 01:14:12 | |
| Harvey Rich | 2023 Birmingham | 01:14:36 | |
| Sharp Brendan | 2023 Sydney | 01:13:48 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
