Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcgrath Conor's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcgrath Conor's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcgrath Conor's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcgrath Conor's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:20 | 46:11 to 42:51 | 59.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:05 | 06:22 to 05:17 | 19.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:58 | 06:01 to 05:03 | 17.1% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:56 to 04:48 | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:30 to 04:26 | 1.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:04 | 04:55 to 04:51 | 1.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:40 to 05:40 | 0.0% |
| Mcgrath Conor | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:11 | 00:00 | 04:43 -01:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 03:11 | 04:29 +00:01 | 04:43 -01:32 |
| Running 2 | 05:30 | 07:41 | 05:06 +00:24 | 09:12 -01:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:05 | 13:11 | 02:59 -00:54 | 14:18 -01:07 |
| Running 3 | 06:23 | 15:16 | 05:33 +00:50 | 17:17 -02:01 |
| Sled Pull | 04:55 | 21:39 | 05:05 -00:10 | 22:50 -01:11 |
| Running 4 | 06:19 | 26:34 | 05:32 +00:47 | 27:55 -01:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:22 | 32:53 | 05:37 +00:45 | 33:27 -00:34 |
| Running 5 | 06:46 | 39:15 | 05:43 +01:03 | 39:04 +00:11 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 46:01 | 04:52 +00:04 | 44:47 +01:14 |
| Running 6 | 06:33 | 50:57 | 05:34 +00:59 | 49:39 +01:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 57:30 | 02:15 -00:10 | 55:13 +02:17 |
| Running 7 | 06:15 | 59:35 | 05:33 +00:42 | 57:28 +02:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:01 | 01:05:50 | 05:21 +00:40 | 01:03:01 +02:49 |
| Running 8 | 05:17 | 01:11:51 | 06:13 -00:56 | 01:08:22 +03:29 |
| Wall Balls | 05:40 | 01:17:08 | 06:48 -01:08 | 01:14:35 +02:33 |
| Roxzone | 05:49 | 01:28:30 | 07:07 -01:18 | 01:28:30 |
Conor McGrath's performance in the 2024 Dublin HYROX event exhibited a commendable effort, ranking in the top 86% of all participants and in the top 88% of his age group. However, specific areas require more attention for improved performance. His total running time was 02:03 slower than the average, indicating a potential endurance issue. Despite this, he started the race with an impressive pace in Running 1, achieving a time 01:31 faster than average. This suggests that Conor is a quick starter but may struggle to maintain this pace throughout the race.
Conor exhibited a stronger performance in strength-based exercises, evidenced by his faster than average times in the Sled Push and Farmers Carry. Strong performances in later running segments and the roxzone also indicate a strong finisher profile. This suggests that Conor is a hybrid athlete, capable of combining speed and strength but may need to focus on his endurance to maintain consistent performance throughout the race.
Based on his performance, Conor should consider the following strategies for future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gutiérrez Fernández Javier | 2024 Madrid | 01:28:03 | |
| Jerent Stevens | 2024 Marseille | 01:28:18 | |
| García Hurtado Randolfo | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:28:27 | |
| Jansen Sven | 2024 Köln | 01:28:31 | |
| Watt Andy | 2024 London | 01:28:30 | |
| Kirschbaum Kai | 2023 Köln | 01:28:28 | |
| Richardson Craig | 2022 Manchester | 01:28:58 | |
| Reenaers Dimitri | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:28:25 | |
| Kaszecki Lukasz | 2024 Gdansk | 01:28:23 | |
| Zucconi Simone | 2024 Rimini | 01:28:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
