Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
241 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 241 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 241 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 241 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
09:08.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 241 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Rachel Mcauley's performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event showcased commendable strengths, particularly in strength-based segments such as the Ski Erg and Rowing, where she ranked in the top 20 percentile. Her overall rank of 618 places her in the top 34% of all participants, and similarly, she ranks in the top 34% within her age group. This indicates a strong competitive edge. Rachel's total running time was 01:03:11, which is slightly slower than average, suggesting that while she demonstrates a hybrid profile, there's room for improvement in running endurance and speed. Notably, her early running segments were slower than average, indicating a potentially conservative start.
Segments to Improve
Sled Pull: Rachel was 01:36 slower than average. To improve, she should focus on building upper body strength and endurance. Exercises: Incorporate pull-ups, bent-over rows, and resistance band sled pulls. Form Correction: Ensure a strong grip and use the legs to drive the pull, maintaining a steady pace to avoid fatigue.
Burpees Broad Jump: At 00:56 slower than average, focus on explosive power and efficient motion. Drills: Perform burpee variations with a focus on speed, and practice broad jumps separately to enhance explosiveness. Technique: Work on fluid transitions between the burpee and the jump, minimizing downtime.
Overall Running: With a total running time slower than average, Rachel should enhance her running efficiency and stamina. Training Routine: Implement interval training to build speed, and long runs to improve endurance. Consider "brick" training sessions combining running and strength exercises to simulate race conditions.
Race Strategies
Pacing Strategy: Rachel should aim for a more balanced start. Implementing a negative split strategy, where the second half of the race is faster than the first, could prevent early fatigue and preserve energy for later segments.
Transition Efficiency: Although Rachel's Roxzone time was strong, further improvement can be achieved by practicing transitions. Set up a mock race environment and rehearse moving quickly between different exercise stations to cut transition time.
Compromised Running: Train under simulated fatigue to improve running performance post-exercise segments. This could involve running immediately after sled pulls or burpees in training sessions to better handle the compromised state during the race.