Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Beddoe Amy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Beddoe Amy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Beddoe Amy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Beddoe Amy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
05:05.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Amy Beddoe has delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race, ranking in the top 12% of 1488 athletes and top 8% within her age group. Amy's performance can be characterized as a hybrid, combining both strength and running elements. However, her Total Running Time was 15 seconds slower than average, suggesting a potential for improvement in her running.
Her pacing throughout the race appears to have been inconsistent. She started off strong in Running 1, with a time that was 33 seconds faster than the average. However, her pace slowed in subsequent running segments. This suggests that Amy might be starting the race too quickly and thus fatiguing sooner, leading to slower times in later running segments.
Segments to Improve:
Wall Balls: Amy's Wall Balls segment was her weakest, with a time that was 3 minutes and 3 seconds slower than the 25th percentile. To improve this, she could incorporate more high-repetition wall ball drills into her training to build endurance and strength. Additionally, focusing on form, specifically keeping the chest up and using the legs to drive the movement, can help increase efficiency and speed in this segment.
Run Total: Overall, Amy's running time was slower than average. To enhance her running performance, she should incorporate more long-distance running into her routine to increase her endurance. Interval training, combining short bursts of high-intensity running with recovery periods, can also help improve running speed.
Sandbag Lunges: Amy's time in the Sandbag Lunges was slower than average. To improve, she might focus on exercises that strengthen her lower body and core, such as squats, lunges, and deadlifts. Practicing lunges with a weighted vest or backpack can also simulate the challenges of the Sandbag Lunges segment.
Race Strategies:
Based on Amy's performance, the following strategies could be implemented for better performance in future races:
Pacing: Amy should pay closer attention to pacing throughout the race. Starting out too quickly can lead to premature fatigue. A more conservative start might allow for better energy conservation and more consistent performance through later segments.
Transitions: Amy could also work on improving her transition times. Although her roxzone time was faster than average, indicating good transition efficiency, consistent practice of transitions between different exercises could further decrease her overall time.
Strength Training: Given the time gaps in the Wall Balls and Sandbag Lunges segments, Amy should incorporate additional strength training into her routine, particularly focusing on exercises that mimic these movements.
Endurance Training: With her total running time being slower than average, Amy might benefit from increased focus on endurance training.