Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:46 (From 44:05 to 42:19) | 34.6% |
| Sled Pull | 01:31 (From 06:17 to 04:46) | 29.7% |
| Sled Push | 01:20 (From 04:07 to 02:47) | 26.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:23 (From 04:48 to 04:25) | 7.5% |
| Rowing | 00:06 (From 04:52 to 04:46) | 2.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 05:00 to 05:00) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:02 to 02:02) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 03:56 to 03:56) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 06:01 to 06:01) | 0.0% |
| Febus Guido | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:49 | 00:00 | 04:43 +01:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:48 | 05:49 | 04:28 +00:20 | 04:43 +01:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:24 | 10:37 | 05:03 +00:21 | 09:11 +01:26 |
| Sled Push | 04:07 | 16:01 | 02:57 +01:10 | 14:14 +01:47 |
| Running 3 | 05:28 | 20:08 | 05:29 -00:01 | 17:11 +02:57 |
| Sled Pull | 06:17 | 25:36 | 05:02 +01:15 | 22:40 +02:56 |
| Running 4 | 05:21 | 31:53 | 05:28 -00:07 | 27:42 +04:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:00 | 37:14 | 05:27 -00:27 | 33:10 +04:04 |
| Running 5 | 05:16 | 42:14 | 05:39 -00:23 | 38:37 +03:37 |
| Rowing | 04:52 | 47:30 | 04:52 +00:00 | 44:16 +03:14 |
| Running 6 | 05:22 | 52:22 | 05:31 -00:09 | 49:08 +03:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 57:44 | 02:13 -00:11 | 54:39 +03:05 |
| Running 7 | 05:19 | 59:46 | 05:29 -00:10 | 56:52 +02:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:56 | 01:05:05 | 05:13 -01:17 | 01:02:21 +02:44 |
| Running 8 | 06:09 | 01:09:01 | 06:08 +00:01 | 01:07:34 +01:27 |
| Wall Balls | 06:01 | 01:15:10 | 06:39 -00:38 | 01:13:42 +01:28 |
| Roxzone | 06:24 | 01:27:27 | 07:06 -00:42 | 01:27:27 |
Guido's overall time of 01:27:27 was respectable, but there are areas for improvement. His total running time of 00:44:05 was 02:18 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to improve his overall fitness and transition time in order to perform better in the roxzone.
For Running 1, Guido was 01:17 slower than the average. To improve his running speed, he should incorporate interval training into his routine. This could involve alternating between high-intensity sprints and slower recovery jogs. Additionally, focusing on strengthening his leg muscles through exercises like squats and lunges will help improve his running performance.
In the Ski Erg segment, Guido was 00:23 slower than the average. To improve his performance on the Ski Erg, he should focus on building strength in his upper body and core. Exercises such as rows, push-ups, and planks will help improve his endurance and power on the Ski Erg.
Running 2 was another segment where Guido was slower than the average, by 00:24. To improve his running speed, he should incorporate hill sprints into his training routine. This will help build strength and endurance in his leg muscles, allowing him to maintain a faster pace during the race.
In the Sled Push and Sled Pull segments, Guido was 00:48 slower than the average. To improve his performance in these segments, he should focus on building overall strength and power. Exercises such as deadlifts, squats, and sled pushes/pulls will help him develop the necessary strength and technique for these movements.
Since Guido's total running time was slower than the average, he should prioritize improving his running performance. This can be achieved by incorporating more running-specific workouts into his training routine, such as tempo runs, interval training, and long-distance runs. Additionally, he should focus on improving his running form and technique to maximize efficiency and minimize energy expenditure.
In the roxzone, Guido should aim to minimize his transition time and maximize his overall fitness. This can be achieved by practicing quick and efficient transitions between exercises during his training sessions. Additionally, incorporating high-intensity interval training and circuit training into his routine will help improve his overall fitness and endurance.
Overall, Guido Febus has shown potential in the Hyrox race, but there is room for improvement. By focusing on the identified areas of weakness and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Van Rangelrooij Ronald | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:27:36 | |
| Wuketich Simon | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:27:14 | |
| Graßmann Christoph | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:27:50 | |
| Frankland Lewis | 2023 Glasgow | 01:27:09 | |
| Purchase Dan | 2023 London | 01:27:57 | |
| Buxton Andrew | 2021 Austin | 01:27:11 | |
| Grebe Michael | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:27:07 | |
| Scott Euan | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:27:51 | |
| Gabriel Andrew | 2024 London | 01:27:42 | |
| Unsworth Jordan | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:27:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam Febus Guido | 01:40:34 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam Febus Guido | 01:33:25 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam Febus Guido | 01:27:39 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Febus Guido
