Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire O'Gorman Lilly's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights O'Gorman Lilly's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the O'Gorman Lilly's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve O'Gorman Lilly's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:44 | 06:37 to 03:53 | 48.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:47 | 04:55 to 04:08 | 13.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:42 | 05:32 to 04:50 | 12.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:39 | 05:44 to 05:05 | 11.5% |
| Rowing | 00:30 | 05:36 to 05:06 | 8.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:18 | 02:36 to 02:18 | 5.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:48 to 01:48 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:43 to 39:43 | 0.0% |
| O'Gorman Lilly | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:12 | 00:00 | 04:52 +00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 05:12 | 05:00 -00:08 | 04:52 +00:20 |
| Running 2 | 04:23 | 10:04 | 05:14 -00:51 | 09:52 +00:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:36 | 14:27 | 02:35 +00:01 | 15:06 -00:39 |
| Running 3 | 04:44 | 17:03 | 05:28 -00:44 | 17:41 -00:38 |
| Sled Pull | 05:32 | 21:47 | 05:19 +00:13 | 23:09 -01:22 |
| Running 4 | 05:03 | 27:19 | 05:29 -00:26 | 28:28 -01:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:44 | 32:22 | 05:31 +00:13 | 33:57 -01:35 |
| Running 5 | 05:23 | 38:06 | 05:37 -00:14 | 39:28 -01:22 |
| Rowing | 05:36 | 43:29 | 05:14 +00:22 | 45:05 -01:36 |
| Running 6 | 04:51 | 49:05 | 05:31 -00:40 | 50:19 -01:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 53:56 | 02:08 -00:20 | 55:50 -01:54 |
| Running 7 | 04:58 | 55:44 | 05:29 -00:31 | 57:58 -02:14 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:55 | 01:00:42 | 04:23 +00:32 | 01:03:27 -02:45 |
| Running 8 | 05:12 | 01:05:37 | 05:50 -00:38 | 01:07:50 -02:13 |
| Wall Balls | 06:37 | 01:10:49 | 04:25 +02:12 | 01:13:40 -02:51 |
| Roxzone | 07:02 | 01:24:23 | 06:18 +00:44 | 01:24:23 |
Lilly O'Gorman, competing in the HYROX category within the 16-24 age group, delivered an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham event. Ranking in the top 7% overall and the top 12% within her age group, Lilly demonstrated clear proficiency in both running and strength segments. Her total running time was 04:11 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner's profile. However, Lilly's performance varied across segments, suggesting opportunities for targeted improvements.
While her running times were consistently faster than the average, her initial start was slower, which could be attributed to either a conservative start or a need for a more powerful kick-off. Her performance gradually improved, with her best running lap being her second one. Her strength exercises showed mixed results; while she performed well in the Ski Erg and Farmers Carry segments, she lost time in others such as the Wall Balls and Sandbag Lunges.
For future races, Lilly should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lorenz Mariangela | 2023 München | 01:24:42 | |
| Wilde Julia | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:24:50 | |
| Kupczynska Karolina | 2024 Katowice | 01:24:44 | |
| Hirst Athina | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:24:13 | |
| Begic Bozena | 2018 Essen | 01:24:26 | |
| Rothkegel Julia | 2021 Leipzig | 01:24:13 | |
| Sigl Maria | 2023 München | 01:24:19 | |
| Unternahrer Aurélie | 2024 Marseille | 01:24:26 | |
| Van Vliet Karin | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:24:46 | |
| Demonte Roberta | 2024 Rimini | 01:24:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
