Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nijboer Tasneem's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nijboer Tasneem's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nijboer Tasneem's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nijboer Tasneem's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:04 | 07:11 to 05:07 | 43.5% |
| Wall Balls | 01:30 | 05:26 to 03:56 | 31.6% |
| Run Total | 00:55 | 43:20 to 42:25 | 19.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:11 | 04:20 to 04:09 | 3.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:04 to 01:59 | 1.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Nijboer Tasneem | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:20 | 00:00 | 04:52 -01:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:47 | 03:20 | 05:00 -00:13 | 04:52 -01:32 |
| Running 2 | 05:05 | 08:07 | 05:15 -00:10 | 09:52 -01:45 |
| Sled Push | 02:14 | 13:12 | 02:35 -00:21 | 15:07 -01:55 |
| Running 3 | 05:29 | 15:26 | 05:30 -00:01 | 17:42 -02:16 |
| Sled Pull | 04:26 | 20:55 | 05:20 -00:54 | 23:12 -02:17 |
| Running 4 | 05:36 | 25:21 | 05:31 +00:05 | 28:32 -03:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:11 | 30:57 | 05:33 +01:38 | 34:03 -03:06 |
| Running 5 | 05:42 | 38:08 | 05:39 +00:03 | 39:36 -01:28 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 43:50 | 05:14 -00:08 | 45:15 -01:25 |
| Running 6 | 05:54 | 48:56 | 05:33 +00:21 | 50:29 -01:33 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 54:50 | 02:09 -00:05 | 56:02 -01:12 |
| Running 7 | 05:50 | 56:54 | 05:31 +00:19 | 58:11 -01:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:20 | 01:02:44 | 04:24 -00:04 | 01:03:42 -00:58 |
| Running 8 | 06:28 | 01:07:04 | 05:52 +00:36 | 01:08:06 -01:02 |
| Wall Balls | 05:26 | 01:13:32 | 04:26 +01:00 | 01:13:58 -00:26 |
| Roxzone | 05:51 | 01:24:40 | 06:16 -00:25 | 01:24:40 |
Tasneem Nijboer delivered an impressive performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, securing a spot in the top 8% of competitors overall and within her age group. Her total running time was notably strong, at 00:43:20, which is 01:00 faster than the average, suggesting a pronounced runner's profile. Her rapid start, particularly in Running 1, indicates a strategic approach but might have led to fatigue in later segments. The data suggests a need for balanced pacing to sustain energy throughout the race. Her performance in strength-based exercises was generally above average, with some room for improvement in specific segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Coronado Megan | 2023 Chicago | 01:24:39 | |
| Mcdonald Catriona | 2024 London | 01:25:10 | |
| Gładysz Joanna | 2024 Gdansk | 01:25:05 | |
| Robbins Caitlin | 2023 London | 01:24:56 | |
| Van Santen Lianne | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:24:16 | |
| Meyer Christina | 2018 Hamburg | 01:25:10 | |
| Van Empel Linette | 2024 Maastricht | 01:24:34 | |
| Galvin Katie | 2022 London | 01:24:59 | |
| Van Schaik Debbie | 2024 Paris | 01:24:12 | |
| Reck Katrin | 2019 Hamburg | 01:24:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
