Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Basel using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 92 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire M. Alexa's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights M. Alexa's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the M. Alexa's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve M. Alexa's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 00:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 00:31 | 02:13 to 01:42 | 96.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 01:27 to 01:26 | 3.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:51 to 03:51 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 02:30 to 02:30 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 02:03 to 02:03 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 02:49 to 02:49 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:40 to 03:40 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 31:22 to 31:22 | 0.0% |
| M. Alexa | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:42 | 00:00 | 03:24 +00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:51 | 03:42 | 03:57 -00:06 | 03:24 +00:18 |
| Running 2 | 03:52 | 07:33 | 03:36 +00:16 | 07:21 +00:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:13 | 11:25 | 02:01 +00:12 | 10:57 +00:28 |
| Running 3 | 03:52 | 13:38 | 03:48 +00:04 | 12:58 +00:40 |
| Sled Pull | 02:30 | 17:30 | 03:04 -00:34 | 16:46 +00:44 |
| Running 4 | 03:53 | 20:00 | 03:48 +00:05 | 19:50 +00:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:03 | 23:53 | 02:51 -00:48 | 23:38 +00:15 |
| Running 5 | 03:55 | 25:56 | 03:52 +00:03 | 26:29 -00:33 |
| Rowing | 04:05 | 29:51 | 04:06 -00:01 | 30:21 -00:30 |
| Running 6 | 03:59 | 33:56 | 03:50 +00:09 | 34:27 -00:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:27 | 37:55 | 01:31 -00:04 | 38:17 -00:22 |
| Running 7 | 04:00 | 39:22 | 03:50 +00:10 | 39:48 -00:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:49 | 43:22 | 03:03 -00:14 | 43:38 -00:16 |
| Running 8 | 04:13 | 46:11 | 04:04 +00:09 | 46:41 -00:30 |
| Wall Balls | 03:40 | 50:24 | 03:55 -00:15 | 50:45 -00:21 |
| Roxzone | 04:34 | 58:30 | 03:50 +00:44 | 58:30 |
In terms of pacing, Alexa M. performed well, maintaining a consistent and steady pace throughout the race. However, there were some areas where he lost time compared to the average, indicating areas for improvement.
Looking at his profile, Alexa M. shows a well-rounded skill set, with a balanced performance across all segments. However, there is room for improvement in both running and strength elements.
In conclusion, Alexa M. had an outstanding performance in the HYROX race, achieving a top-ranking position in his age group and overall. To further enhance his performance, he should focus on improving his running segments, particularly Running 1, Running 2, Running 6, and Running 7. Implementing specific training strategies, such as interval training and speed drills, can help him increase his speed and endurance. Additionally, optimizing his pacing strategy and minimizing transition time in the Roxzone will contribute to improved overall performance. With dedication and targeted training, Alexa M. has the potential to further excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lizarazu Hormilla Aitor | 2023 Madrid | 58:09 | |
| Walker Joe | 2024 Manchester | 59:00 | |
| Thorne Ben | 2024 Paris | 58:58 | |
| Applewhite Ewan | 2024 Poznan | 58:50 | |
| Bauer Jan Nicholas | 2024 Copenhagen | 58:48 | |
| Brown Lawrence | 2023 Birmingham | 58:42 | |
| Hidalgo Izquierdo Jose Angel | 2023 Malaga | 58:00 | |
| Levoy Guillaume | 2023 Paris | 58:17 | |
| PriceOwen Jess | 2024 Manchester | 58:34 | |
| Maire Robert | 2023 Hannover | 58:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 München | 01:03:12 | |
| 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:24:21 | |
| 2021 Hamburg | 01:33:57 | |
| 2023 Hannover | 01:44:02 | |
| 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:30:46 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
