Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 804 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Greenwood Ollie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Greenwood Ollie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Greenwood Ollie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Greenwood Ollie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 10:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 10:45 | 01:01:56 to 51:11 | 99.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:06 | 07:23 to 07:17 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:31 to 02:31 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:21 to 02:21 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:56 to 06:56 | 0.0% |
| Greenwood Ollie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:54 | 00:00 | 05:18 +01:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 06:54 | 04:47 -00:16 | 05:18 +01:36 |
| Running 2 | 07:03 | 11:25 | 05:59 +01:04 | 10:05 +01:20 |
| Sled Push | 02:31 | 18:28 | 03:43 -01:12 | 16:04 +02:24 |
| Running 3 | 08:10 | 20:59 | 06:36 +01:34 | 19:47 +01:12 |
| Sled Pull | 04:50 | 29:09 | 06:33 -01:43 | 26:23 +02:46 |
| Running 4 | 08:10 | 33:59 | 06:35 +01:35 | 32:56 +01:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:23 | 42:09 | 07:22 +00:01 | 39:31 +02:38 |
| Running 5 | 07:58 | 49:32 | 06:54 +01:04 | 46:53 +02:39 |
| Rowing | 04:52 | 57:30 | 05:19 -00:27 | 53:47 +03:43 |
| Running 6 | 07:33 | 01:02:22 | 06:40 +00:53 | 59:06 +03:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 01:09:55 | 02:41 -00:20 | 01:05:46 +04:09 |
| Running 7 | 07:20 | 01:12:16 | 06:41 +00:39 | 01:08:27 +03:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:35 | 01:19:36 | 06:54 -01:19 | 01:15:08 +04:28 |
| Running 8 | 08:51 | 01:25:11 | 08:08 +00:43 | 01:22:02 +03:09 |
| Wall Balls | 06:56 | 01:34:02 | 08:53 -01:57 | 01:30:10 +03:52 |
| Roxzone | 08:06 | 01:48:57 | 09:54 -01:48 | 01:48:57 |
Ollie Greenwood demonstrated an impressive performance in the 2024 Manchester HYROX race. Despite a higher overall rank and age group ranking, he has shown significant strength in specific areas. His total running time was slower than average, indicating a stronger emphasis on strength-based exercises in his training regimen. His pacing during the race appeared to be slower, particularly in the running segments, which could be a potential area for improvement. However, it's worth noting his faster-than-average performance in the roxzone, indicating his proficiency in transition and recovery times.
Improving race performance isn't just about physical training, but also about implementing effective race strategies. Here are some suggestions:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kara Dogan | 2019 Essen | 01:48:46 | |
| Bruch Constantin | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:49:25 | |
| David Zsolt | 2023 Wien | 01:48:31 | |
| Lee Gary | 2024 Taipei | 01:48:32 | |
| Leonardo Conrado | 2024 Melbourne | 01:48:43 | |
| Vorpahl Hannes | 2021 Berlin | 01:48:42 | |
| Gaedtke Rene | 2022 Essen | 01:48:48 | |
| Rachdi Tarik | 2024 Marseille | 01:48:56 | |
| Galia Marco | 2024 Rimini | 01:49:11 | |
| Van Dorst Jean Paul | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:49:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
