Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Feenstra Niels's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Feenstra Niels's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Feenstra Niels's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Feenstra Niels's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:45 | 44:27 to 38:42 | 92.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 04:28 to 04:14 | 3.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:08 | 04:28 to 04:20 | 2.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 01:57 to 01:51 | 1.6% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:35 to 04:34 | 0.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:42 to 03:42 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:57 to 03:57 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Feenstra Niels | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:49 | 00:00 | 04:20 -00:31 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 03:49 | 04:20 +00:08 | 04:20 -00:31 |
| Running 2 | 05:27 | 08:17 | 04:40 +00:47 | 08:40 -00:23 |
| Sled Push | 02:10 | 13:44 | 02:41 -00:31 | 13:20 +00:24 |
| Running 3 | 05:52 | 15:54 | 05:03 +00:49 | 16:01 -00:07 |
| Sled Pull | 03:42 | 21:46 | 04:28 -00:46 | 21:04 +00:42 |
| Running 4 | 05:36 | 25:28 | 05:02 +00:34 | 25:32 -00:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:28 | 31:04 | 04:45 -00:17 | 30:34 +00:30 |
| Running 5 | 05:47 | 35:32 | 05:11 +00:36 | 35:19 +00:13 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 41:19 | 04:40 -00:05 | 40:30 +00:49 |
| Running 6 | 05:38 | 45:54 | 05:04 +00:34 | 45:10 +00:44 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 51:32 | 02:02 -00:05 | 50:14 +01:18 |
| Running 7 | 06:02 | 53:29 | 05:02 +01:00 | 52:16 +01:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:57 | 59:31 | 04:37 -00:40 | 57:18 +02:13 |
| Running 8 | 06:21 | 01:03:28 | 05:31 +00:50 | 01:01:55 +01:33 |
| Wall Balls | 03:59 | 01:09:49 | 05:49 -01:50 | 01:07:26 +02:23 |
| Roxzone | 05:40 | 01:19:17 | 06:02 -00:22 | 01:19:17 |
Niels Feenstra delivered a solid performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, placing in the top 21% overall and top 23% in his age group. His overall time was 01:19:17. Notably, Niels excelled in strength-based exercises, particularly in the Wall Balls and Sled events, indicating a strong strength profile. However, his total running time was 04:10 slower than average, suggesting that running is an area where he could improve. His early pacing was strong, with Running 1 significantly faster than average, but subsequent laps showed a decline, indicating a need for better pacing strategies.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lepas Richard | 2023 Paris | 01:19:02 | |
| Adelfinger Karl | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:19:06 | |
| Conner Dominic | 2023 London | 01:19:01 | |
| Oberle Joerg | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:19:15 | |
| 陳 世銘 | 2024 Taipei | 01:19:37 | |
| Corby Sebastian | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:19:41 | |
| Götz Christopher | 2022 Essen | 01:18:54 | |
| Deliers Florian | 2023 Singapore | 01:19:45 | |
| Weiss Fabian | 2023 München | 01:19:30 | |
| Linderman David | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
