Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Dale Gracie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Dale Gracie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Dale Gracie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Dale Gracie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:42 | 46:48 to 44:06 | 66.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:48 | 05:13 to 04:25 | 19.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:26 | 05:36 to 05:10 | 10.7% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:21 to 05:13 | 3.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:33 to 01:33 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:28 to 05:28 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:53 to 01:53 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:25 to 03:25 | 0.0% |
| Dale Gracie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:01 | 00:00 | 05:02 -00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 05:01 | 05:04 -00:08 | 05:02 -00:01 |
| Running 2 | 05:03 | 09:57 | 05:23 -00:20 | 10:06 -00:09 |
| Sled Push | 01:33 | 15:00 | 02:39 -01:06 | 15:29 -00:29 |
| Running 3 | 05:11 | 16:33 | 05:38 -00:27 | 18:08 -01:35 |
| Sled Pull | 05:36 | 21:44 | 05:34 +00:02 | 23:46 -02:02 |
| Running 4 | 05:16 | 27:20 | 05:41 -00:25 | 29:20 -02:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:28 | 32:36 | 05:53 -00:25 | 35:01 -02:25 |
| Running 5 | 05:22 | 38:04 | 05:49 -00:27 | 40:54 -02:50 |
| Rowing | 05:21 | 43:26 | 05:18 +00:03 | 46:43 -03:17 |
| Running 6 | 10:03 | 48:47 | 05:43 +04:20 | 52:01 -03:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 58:50 | 02:12 -00:19 | 57:44 +01:06 |
| Running 7 | 05:13 | 01:00:43 | 05:42 -00:29 | 59:56 +00:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:13 | 01:05:56 | 04:37 +00:36 | 01:05:38 +00:18 |
| Running 8 | 05:43 | 01:11:09 | 06:04 -00:21 | 01:10:15 +00:54 |
| Wall Balls | 03:25 | 01:16:52 | 04:47 -01:22 | 01:16:19 +00:33 |
| Roxzone | 07:36 | 01:27:45 | 06:39 +00:57 | 01:27:45 |
Gracie Dale delivered a strong performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, achieving an overall rank in the top 14% of all participants and placing in the top 26% within her age group. Her overall time of 01:27:45 demonstrates a commendable effort, especially given her impressive strength in many of the race's exercises. Notably, Gracie excelled in strength events such as the Sled Push, where she finished significantly faster than average. However, Gracie's total running time was slightly slower than average, indicating that her profile leans more towards strength rather than running. Additionally, the pacing analysis shows that Gracie started the race conservatively, gaining speed through the middle segments but struggled notably in Running 6, which was considerably slower than average.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenny Ella | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:27:36 | |
| Donnelly Jade | 2023 London | 01:27:55 | |
| Thiemar Silvana | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:28:14 | |
| Thiedke Lucy | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:28:12 | |
| Dichiara Phoebe | 2024 London | 01:27:46 | |
| Cox Stephanie | 2023 Glasgow | 01:27:41 | |
| Wheeland Caroleen | 2022 Chicago | 01:27:25 | |
| Casagrande Anna | 2024 Rimini | 01:27:39 | |
| Waugh Andrea | 2024 London | 01:27:24 | |
| Perkins Maryanne | 2024 Sydney | 01:27:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
