Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Den Boom Norman's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Den Boom Norman's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Den Boom Norman's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Den Boom Norman's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:21 | 06:22 to 05:01 | 45.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:54 | 03:01 to 02:07 | 30.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:34 | 05:48 to 05:14 | 19.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:31 to 04:26 | 2.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:05 | 06:24 to 06:19 | 2.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:45 to 02:45 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:59 to 41:59 | 0.0% |
| Van Den Boom Norman | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:06 | 00:00 | 04:41 +00:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 05:06 | 04:29 +00:02 | 04:41 +00:25 |
| Running 2 | 04:57 | 09:37 | 05:05 -00:08 | 09:10 +00:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:45 | 14:34 | 02:59 -00:14 | 14:15 +00:19 |
| Running 3 | 05:16 | 17:19 | 05:33 -00:17 | 17:14 +00:05 |
| Sled Pull | 04:44 | 22:35 | 05:05 -00:21 | 22:47 -00:12 |
| Running 4 | 05:13 | 27:19 | 05:31 -00:18 | 27:52 -00:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:48 | 32:32 | 05:34 +00:14 | 33:23 -00:51 |
| Running 5 | 05:11 | 38:20 | 05:42 -00:31 | 38:57 -00:37 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 43:31 | 04:52 -00:08 | 44:39 -01:08 |
| Running 6 | 05:06 | 48:15 | 05:33 -00:27 | 49:31 -01:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:01 | 53:21 | 02:14 +00:47 | 55:04 -01:43 |
| Running 7 | 05:08 | 56:22 | 05:32 -00:24 | 57:18 -00:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:22 | 01:01:30 | 05:18 +01:04 | 01:02:50 -01:20 |
| Running 8 | 06:06 | 01:07:52 | 06:11 -00:05 | 01:08:08 -00:16 |
| Wall Balls | 06:24 | 01:13:58 | 06:45 -00:21 | 01:14:19 -00:21 |
| Roxzone | 07:54 | 01:28:09 | 07:05 +00:49 | 01:28:09 |
Norman Van Den Boom's performance at the 2024 Hamburg event showcased a promising mix of strength and agility. Ranking within the top 68% of all participants in the HYROX category, Norman certainly demonstrated a commendable level of fitness. His total running time was faster than average by 01:59, suggesting a strength in endurance and speed. However, his performance across the multiple segments of the race shows room for improvement, specifically in the Roxzone and strength-based exercises. His pacing could have been better managed, starting slower than average in Running 1, but he then caught up and maintained a faster than average pace in the subsequent running segments. This indicates a strong runner profile and recommends more focus on strength training for a more balanced performance.
Norman's performance in future races could benefit from a few strategic changes:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bold Callum | 2024 Manchester | 01:28:11 | |
| Van Der Zwet Rick | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:28:29 | |
| Valente Matteo | 2024 Turin | 01:28:23 | |
| Shiplee Carl | 2024 London | 01:28:38 | |
| Sincock Robert | 2023 London | 01:27:43 | |
| Hooper Aaron | 2024 Turin | 01:27:49 | |
| Rabold Kevin | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:27:47 | |
| Camp Hardin | 2021 Austin | 01:27:43 | |
| Watts Matt | 2024 Berlin | 01:28:25 | |
| Rijkers Hein | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:28:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Hamburg | 01:23:53 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
