Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Topf Mirjam's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Topf Mirjam's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Topf Mirjam's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Topf Mirjam's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:08 | 43:32 to 41:24 | 48.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:52 | 05:34 to 04:42 | 19.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:42 | 05:35 to 04:53 | 15.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:19 | 02:15 to 01:56 | 7.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:17 | 02:31 to 02:14 | 6.4% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 05:09 to 05:03 | 2.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:17 to 03:17 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 02:53 to 02:53 | 0.0% |
| Topf Mirjam | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:45 | 00:00 | 04:47 -00:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:48 | 04:45 | 04:58 -00:10 | 04:47 -00:02 |
| Running 2 | 05:21 | 09:33 | 05:07 +00:14 | 09:45 -00:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:31 | 14:54 | 02:33 -00:02 | 14:52 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:30 | 17:25 | 05:23 +00:07 | 17:25 +00:00 |
| Sled Pull | 05:34 | 22:55 | 05:13 +00:21 | 22:48 +00:07 |
| Running 4 | 05:34 | 28:29 | 05:24 +00:10 | 28:01 +00:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:35 | 34:03 | 05:20 +00:15 | 33:25 +00:38 |
| Running 5 | 05:32 | 39:38 | 05:31 +00:01 | 38:45 +00:53 |
| Rowing | 05:09 | 45:10 | 05:12 -00:03 | 44:16 +00:54 |
| Running 6 | 05:33 | 50:19 | 05:26 +00:07 | 49:28 +00:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 55:52 | 02:07 +00:08 | 54:54 +00:58 |
| Running 7 | 05:23 | 58:07 | 05:24 -00:01 | 57:01 +01:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:17 | 01:03:30 | 04:19 -01:02 | 01:02:25 +01:05 |
| Running 8 | 05:59 | 01:06:47 | 05:45 +00:14 | 01:06:44 +00:03 |
| Wall Balls | 02:53 | 01:12:46 | 04:19 -01:26 | 01:12:29 +00:17 |
| Roxzone | 07:17 | 01:22:47 | 05:59 +01:18 | 01:22:47 |
Mirjam's total running time of 00:43:32 was 01:31 slower than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she may benefit from improving her overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, her best running lap of 00:04:45 shows that she has the potential to improve her running speed.
Overall, Mirjam Topf had a strong performance in the 2023 Hamburg HYROX race. By focusing on improving her overall fitness, transition time, and specific segments, she can further enhance her performance in future races. Incorporating specific training strategies, exercises, and race strategies will help her reach her full potential as a fitness athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Del Mastro Alessia | 2023 Milan | 01:23:02 | |
| Noble Kate | 2022 Birmingham | 01:22:21 | |
| Plummer Jody | 2024 Melbourne | 01:22:30 | |
| Mcgann Edel | 2024 Dublin | 01:23:13 | |
| Eddinger Missy | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:22:36 | |
| Hebrock Laura | 2023 Hamburg | 01:22:50 | |
| Strong Nicole | 2023 Madrid | 01:22:29 | |
| Waldmann Sarah | 2024 Dallas | 01:22:37 | |
| Schalansky Sandra | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:23:02 | |
| Snoodyk Katy | 2022 London | 01:22:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Berlin | 01:17:26 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
