Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 683 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Reilly Samantha's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Reilly Samantha's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Reilly Samantha's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Reilly Samantha's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:58 | 54:45 to 51:47 | 52.8% |
| Sled Push | 01:11 | 04:21 to 03:10 | 21.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:33 | 03:06 to 02:33 | 9.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:17 | 07:50 to 07:33 | 5.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:16 | 05:58 to 05:42 | 4.7% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 05:54 to 05:42 | 3.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:10 | 06:53 to 06:43 | 3.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Reilly Samantha | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:08 | 00:00 | 05:42 -00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:14 | 05:08 | 05:24 -00:10 | 05:42 -00:34 |
| Running 2 | 06:00 | 10:22 | 06:13 -00:13 | 11:06 -00:44 |
| Sled Push | 04:21 | 16:22 | 03:09 +01:12 | 17:19 -00:57 |
| Running 3 | 06:15 | 20:43 | 06:37 -00:22 | 20:28 +00:15 |
| Sled Pull | 06:53 | 26:58 | 06:49 +00:04 | 27:05 -00:07 |
| Running 4 | 06:20 | 33:51 | 06:38 -00:18 | 33:54 -00:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:50 | 40:11 | 07:53 -00:03 | 40:32 -00:21 |
| Running 5 | 06:53 | 48:01 | 06:51 +00:02 | 48:25 -00:24 |
| Rowing | 05:54 | 54:54 | 05:46 +00:08 | 55:16 -00:22 |
| Running 6 | 09:57 | 01:00:48 | 06:45 +03:12 | 01:01:02 -00:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:06 | 01:10:45 | 02:34 +00:32 | 01:07:47 +02:58 |
| Running 7 | 06:11 | 01:13:51 | 06:43 -00:32 | 01:10:21 +03:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:58 | 01:20:02 | 05:51 +00:07 | 01:17:04 +02:58 |
| Running 8 | 08:05 | 01:26:00 | 07:26 +00:39 | 01:22:55 +03:05 |
| Wall Balls | 04:06 | 01:34:05 | 06:22 -02:16 | 01:30:21 +03:44 |
| Roxzone | 07:30 | 01:45:32 | 08:49 -01:19 | 01:45:32 |
Splits Analysis:
- Samantha's total running time of 00:54:45 was 03:41 slower than the average. This indicates that she could benefit from improving her overall fitness and transition time between exercises.
- Her best running lap was 00:05:08, which was 00:19 faster than the average. This suggests that she has good running ability and can capitalize on this strength.
- Samantha performed well in several other segments, such as the Ski Erg, Running 2, Running 3, Sled Pull, Running 4, Running 5, Running 7, Wall Balls, and Roxzone, where she was faster than the average. These segments indicate that she has good overall strength and endurance.
- However, Samantha struggled in the Sled Push, Running 6, Farmers Carry, Running 8, and Burpees Broad Jump segments, where she lost significant time compared to the average. These are the areas where she should focus on improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bresciani Giulia | 2024 Milan | 01:45:07 | |
| Doria Manuela | 2024 Rimini | 01:45:32 | |
| Fullerton Hayley | 2023 London | 01:45:26 | |
| Zareba Hattie | 2024 Manchester | 01:45:25 | |
| O Grady Tara | 2023 Dublin | 01:45:15 | |
| Chatwin Grace | 2024 Brisbane | 01:45:52 | |
| Shah Binny | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:45:56 | |
| Lee Bryony | 2024 London | 01:45:55 | |
| Drew Kait | 2024 Melbourne | 01:45:42 | |
| Kamenicek Simona | 2024 Birmingham | 01:45:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
