Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pyle Matt's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pyle Matt's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pyle Matt's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pyle Matt's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:24 | 07:40 to 06:16 | 44.0% |
| Run Total | 00:52 | 47:52 to 47:00 | 27.2% |
| Rowing | 00:31 | 05:34 to 05:03 | 16.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:19 | 03:36 to 03:17 | 9.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:05 | 05:56 to 05:51 | 2.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:26 to 06:26 | 0.0% |
| Pyle Matt | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:39 | 00:00 | 05:02 -01:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 03:39 | 04:38 -00:19 | 05:02 -01:23 |
| Running 2 | 05:25 | 07:58 | 05:29 -00:04 | 09:40 -01:42 |
| Sled Push | 03:36 | 13:23 | 03:17 +00:19 | 15:09 -01:46 |
| Running 3 | 07:29 | 16:59 | 06:01 +01:28 | 18:26 -01:27 |
| Sled Pull | 04:19 | 24:28 | 05:45 -01:26 | 24:27 +00:01 |
| Running 4 | 06:23 | 28:47 | 06:02 +00:21 | 30:12 -01:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:40 | 35:10 | 06:30 +01:10 | 36:14 -01:04 |
| Running 5 | 06:25 | 42:50 | 06:16 +00:09 | 42:44 +00:06 |
| Rowing | 05:34 | 49:15 | 05:06 +00:28 | 49:00 +00:15 |
| Running 6 | 05:43 | 54:49 | 06:05 -00:22 | 54:06 +00:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 01:00:32 | 02:27 -00:29 | 01:00:11 +00:21 |
| Running 7 | 06:01 | 01:02:30 | 06:04 -00:03 | 01:02:38 -00:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:56 | 01:08:31 | 06:05 -00:09 | 01:08:42 -00:11 |
| Running 8 | 06:50 | 01:14:27 | 07:01 -00:11 | 01:14:47 -00:20 |
| Wall Balls | 06:26 | 01:21:17 | 07:51 -01:25 | 01:21:48 -00:31 |
| Roxzone | 10:29 | 01:38:04 | 08:25 +02:04 | 01:38:04 |
Matt Pyle demonstrated a commendable performance in the HYROX race, finishing in the top 38% of his age group and top 40% overall. His total running time was faster than average, suggesting that Matt has a more runner-oriented profile. He started the race strong, with his first running split being significantly faster than the average, a trend that continued throughout the race. However, the time spent in the roxzone was slower than average, indicating room for improvement in overall fitness and transition time.
Matt should consider pacing himself more evenly throughout the race. Even though he started strong, his performance in later segments like the third run and roxzone indicates possible fatigue. By conserving energy in the initial stages, he may improve his overall time.
Given his running strength, Matt should take advantage of the running segments to gain time. However, he should also ensure to maintain energy for strength-based exercises. A balanced focus on both running and strength training can help Matt become a more well-rounded athlete and improve his overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kreimes Martin | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:38:19 | |
| Parker Will | 2022 London | 01:37:49 | |
| Davidson Ewan | 2022 London | 01:38:14 | |
| Mcelhinney Liam | 2023 New York | 01:38:06 | |
| Löhe Max | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:38:04 | |
| Verna Jumel | 2023 New York | 01:37:34 | |
| Djerejian Gregory | 2019 Miami | 01:37:56 | |
| Aelen Yvo | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:38:33 | |
| Mc Neill Ian | 2024 Glasgow | 01:38:23 | |
| Gurrisi Andrew | 2024 Melbourne | 01:37:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
