Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcaliskey Oisin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcaliskey Oisin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcaliskey Oisin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcaliskey Oisin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:57 | 44:16 to 41:19 | 51.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:06 | 05:52 to 04:46 | 19.0% |
| Wall Balls | 01:03 | 07:01 to 05:58 | 18.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:27 | 02:28 to 02:01 | 7.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:14 | 02:54 to 02:40 | 4.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:55 to 03:55 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Mcaliskey Oisin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:25 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:01 | 04:25 | 04:25 -00:24 | 04:35 -00:10 |
| Running 2 | 03:50 | 08:26 | 04:55 -01:05 | 09:00 -00:34 |
| Sled Push | 02:54 | 12:16 | 02:51 +00:03 | 13:55 -01:39 |
| Running 3 | 09:29 | 15:10 | 05:21 +04:08 | 16:46 -01:36 |
| Sled Pull | 03:55 | 24:39 | 04:51 -00:56 | 22:07 +02:32 |
| Running 4 | 09:17 | 28:34 | 05:20 +03:57 | 26:58 +01:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:33 | 37:51 | 05:14 -00:41 | 32:18 +05:33 |
| Running 5 | 04:11 | 42:24 | 05:30 -01:19 | 37:32 +04:52 |
| Rowing | 04:24 | 46:35 | 04:47 -00:23 | 43:02 +03:33 |
| Running 6 | 04:10 | 50:59 | 05:21 -01:11 | 47:49 +03:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:28 | 55:09 | 02:09 +00:19 | 53:10 +01:59 |
| Running 7 | 04:21 | 57:37 | 05:20 -00:59 | 55:19 +02:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:52 | 01:01:58 | 05:02 +00:50 | 01:00:39 +01:19 |
| Running 8 | 04:36 | 01:07:50 | 05:56 -01:20 | 01:05:41 +02:09 |
| Wall Balls | 07:01 | 01:12:26 | 06:24 +00:37 | 01:11:37 +00:49 |
| Roxzone | 05:24 | 01:24:44 | 06:43 -01:19 | 01:24:44 |
Oisin Mcaliskey's performance in the 2024 Madrid HYROX event was commendable, placing him in the top 25% of his age category and overall top 31% of the 1509 athletes. His overall time was 01:24:44 with a total running time of 00:44:16, which was 01:43 slower than average. This suggests that Oisin has a stronger strength profile and could benefit from additional running training. His pacing throughout the race demonstrated an initial fast start but showed a significant loss of time during the third and fourth running segments, which were 04:06 and 03:55 slower than average respectively.
Oisin should consider a more measured pace in the initial running segments to conserve energy for the later stages of the race. Focusing on transition times between segments can also help improve his overall time. He should maintain a steady rhythm during running segments and focus on the technique during strength exercises. A pre-race warm-up routine, focusing on mobility and muscle activation, can also help prepare his body for the race and potentially improve performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Stephen | 2023 Glasgow | 01:24:45 | |
| Song Mingyu | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:24:25 | |
| Spreng Nico | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:24:42 | |
| Sykes Sam | 2024 Perth | 01:24:57 | |
| Feil Michael | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:24:14 | |
| Hall Danny | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:45 | |
| Urrieta Juan | 2024 Anaheim | 01:24:17 | |
| Masiero Enrico Maria | 2024 Milan | 01:24:36 | |
| Ho Andy | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:25:00 | |
| Echevarría Larreátegui Rubén | 2024 Madrid | 01:24:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
