Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Frankfurt using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kreimes Martin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kreimes Martin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kreimes Martin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kreimes Martin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 00:46 | 03:42 to 02:56 | 26.9% |
| Rowing | 00:39 | 05:30 to 04:51 | 22.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:34 | 05:34 to 05:00 | 19.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:27 | 04:56 to 04:29 | 15.8% |
| Run Total | 00:25 | 44:08 to 43:43 | 14.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:57 to 01:57 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:40 to 05:40 | 0.0% |
| Kreimes Martin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:17 | 00:00 | 04:45 +00:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 05:17 | 04:31 +00:25 | 04:45 +00:32 |
| Running 2 | 05:15 | 10:13 | 05:08 +00:07 | 09:16 +00:57 |
| Sled Push | 03:42 | 15:28 | 03:04 +00:38 | 14:24 +01:04 |
| Running 3 | 05:34 | 19:10 | 05:37 -00:03 | 17:28 +01:42 |
| Sled Pull | 05:34 | 24:44 | 05:15 +00:19 | 23:05 +01:39 |
| Running 4 | 05:25 | 30:18 | 05:36 -00:11 | 28:20 +01:58 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:07 | 35:43 | 05:46 -00:39 | 33:56 +01:47 |
| Running 5 | 05:43 | 40:50 | 05:48 -00:05 | 39:42 +01:08 |
| Rowing | 05:30 | 46:33 | 04:55 +00:35 | 45:30 +01:03 |
| Running 6 | 05:17 | 52:03 | 05:38 -00:21 | 50:25 +01:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 57:20 | 02:18 -00:21 | 56:03 +01:17 |
| Running 7 | 05:24 | 59:17 | 05:37 -00:13 | 58:21 +00:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:47 | 01:04:41 | 05:29 -00:42 | 01:03:58 +00:43 |
| Running 8 | 06:17 | 01:09:28 | 06:20 -00:03 | 01:09:27 +00:01 |
| Wall Balls | 05:40 | 01:15:45 | 06:59 -01:19 | 01:15:47 -00:02 |
| Roxzone | 09:01 | 01:30:16 | 07:30 +01:31 | 01:30:16 |
Based on the splits analysis, Martin performed well in some segments, such as the Sled Pull and Burpees Broad Jump, where he was faster than the average time. However, he struggled in segments like the Roxzone, Running 1, Rowing, Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Running 2, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
In summary, Martin Kreimes had a strong performance in the 2022 Frankfurt Hyrox race. To improve his overall performance, he should focus on reducing his transition time and improving his overall fitness. Specifically, he should work on his running speed, upper body strength, and lower body strength. By implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, Martin can enhance his performance in the identified areas and aim for even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Robson Neil | 2023 London | 01:30:40 | |
| Bayliss Mark | 2022 London | 01:29:52 | |
| Nash Michael | 2024 Melbourne | 01:30:41 | |
| Sen Hopi | 2023 London | 01:29:55 | |
| Reade Donal | 2024 Madrid | 01:29:54 | |
| Trenschel Marius | 2023 Hannover | 01:29:52 | |
| Mccarthy Rohan | 2023 London | 01:30:08 | |
| Tomassovits Thomas | 2023 Wien | 01:30:29 | |
| Mason James | 2022 London | 01:30:16 | |
| RonnerMcginn Ben | 2024 Dublin | 01:29:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Frankfurt | 01:38:19 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt | 01:32:30 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
