Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gugelmann Jeffrey's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gugelmann Jeffrey's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gugelmann Jeffrey's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gugelmann Jeffrey's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:57. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:21 | 09:43 to 06:22 | 84.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:26 | 03:16 to 02:50 | 11.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:07 | 05:24 to 05:17 | 3.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:03 | 05:06 to 05:03 | 1.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:57 to 01:57 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:50 to 42:50 | 0.0% |
| Gugelmann Jeffrey | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:38 | 00:00 | 04:42 -00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 04:38 | 04:29 -00:18 | 04:42 -00:04 |
| Running 2 | 04:53 | 08:49 | 05:05 -00:12 | 09:11 -00:22 |
| Sled Push | 03:16 | 13:42 | 02:59 +00:17 | 14:16 -00:34 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 16:58 | 05:33 -00:10 | 17:15 -00:17 |
| Sled Pull | 04:14 | 22:21 | 05:05 -00:51 | 22:48 -00:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:28 | 26:35 | 05:32 -00:04 | 27:53 -01:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:24 | 32:03 | 05:35 -00:11 | 33:25 -01:22 |
| Running 5 | 05:35 | 37:27 | 05:42 -00:07 | 39:00 -01:33 |
| Rowing | 04:15 | 43:02 | 04:52 -00:37 | 44:42 -01:40 |
| Running 6 | 05:31 | 47:17 | 05:34 -00:03 | 49:34 -02:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 52:48 | 02:15 -00:18 | 55:08 -02:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 54:45 | 05:33 -00:18 | 57:23 -02:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:06 | 01:00:00 | 05:21 -00:15 | 01:02:56 -02:56 |
| Running 8 | 06:12 | 01:05:06 | 06:13 -00:01 | 01:08:17 -03:11 |
| Wall Balls | 09:43 | 01:11:18 | 06:47 +02:56 | 01:14:30 -03:12 |
| Roxzone | 07:30 | 01:28:21 | 07:04 +00:26 | 01:28:21 |
Jeffrey's best running lap was 00:04:38, which was 6 seconds slower than the average. In terms of splits, he performed better than average in the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Rowing, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls. However, he struggled in the segments of Burpees Broad Jump, Roxzone, and Running 8.
- Mental Preparation: In addition to physical training, Jeffrey should also focus on mental preparation for the race. Developing strategies to stay mentally focused and motivated throughout the race can help improve his overall performance. This can include visualization techniques, positive self-talk, and setting specific goals for each segment.
Overall, Jeffrey Gugelmann had a commendable performance in the 2022 London Hyrox race. To further improve, he should focus on specific areas of weakness, such as Burpees Broad Jump and the Roxzone. By incorporating targeted training strategies and techniques, he can enhance his performance and strive for even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Priester Jesse | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:28:32 | |
| Mccool Bill | 2023 New York | 01:28:07 | |
| Egan Dan | 2022 Chicago | 01:28:09 | |
| Low Jordan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:27:53 | |
| Dekker Noah | 2024 Maastricht | 01:28:51 | |
| Weider Matthew | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:28:47 | |
| Stephens Harry | 2024 London | 01:28:40 | |
| Barnes Nathan | 2022 Birmingham | 01:28:40 | |
| Berlin David | 2024 New York | 01:28:37 | |
| Kaiser Sascha | 2019 Essen | 01:28:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
