Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Farrell Gerard's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Farrell Gerard's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Farrell Gerard's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Farrell Gerard's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:43 | 06:36 to 04:53 | 46.6% |
| Run Total | 01:37 | 42:46 to 41:09 | 43.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 02:13 to 02:01 | 5.4% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:47 to 04:42 | 2.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:23 to 04:21 | 0.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:41 to 02:39 | 0.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:34 to 03:34 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Farrell Gerard | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:22 | 00:00 | 04:34 +00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 05:22 | 04:25 -00:02 | 04:34 +00:48 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 09:45 | 04:54 -00:04 | 08:59 +00:46 |
| Sled Push | 02:41 | 14:35 | 02:52 -00:11 | 13:53 +00:42 |
| Running 3 | 05:00 | 17:16 | 05:21 -00:21 | 16:45 +00:31 |
| Sled Pull | 04:31 | 22:16 | 04:51 -00:20 | 22:06 +00:10 |
| Running 4 | 05:12 | 26:47 | 05:19 -00:07 | 26:57 -00:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:36 | 31:59 | 05:12 +01:24 | 32:16 -00:17 |
| Running 5 | 05:16 | 38:35 | 05:29 -00:13 | 37:28 +01:07 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 43:51 | 04:47 +00:00 | 42:57 +00:54 |
| Running 6 | 05:20 | 48:38 | 05:20 +00:00 | 47:44 +00:54 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 53:58 | 02:08 +00:05 | 53:04 +00:54 |
| Running 7 | 05:22 | 56:11 | 05:19 +00:03 | 55:12 +00:59 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:34 | 01:01:33 | 04:59 -01:25 | 01:00:31 +01:02 |
| Running 8 | 06:28 | 01:05:07 | 05:55 +00:33 | 01:05:30 -00:23 |
| Wall Balls | 05:10 | 01:11:35 | 06:20 -01:10 | 01:11:25 +00:10 |
| Roxzone | 07:51 | 01:24:26 | 06:41 +01:10 | 01:24:26 |
Gerard Farrell's performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race was commendable, placing him in the top 31% of all athletes and top 28% of his age group. However, there are specific areas where he can make significant improvements to boost his rankings. His overall time was 01:24:26, and his total running time was 00:42:46, which was 00:22 slower than the average. This indicates that Gerard has a strength-biased profile and should focus more on improving his running performance. His pacing throughout the race, especially in the initial segments, was slower compared to the average, suggesting that he started off too slow. This could potentially impact his total time negatively. His best running lap was 00:04:50, which is a strong point he can leverage.
Gerard should consider implementing the following strategies during the race for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Villani Luca | 2024 Rimini | 01:24:23 | |
| Holt Matthew | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:24:54 | |
| Damnitz Sven | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:24:22 | |
| Lumbreras Orlando | 2023 Madrid | 01:24:02 | |
| Collet Kévin | 2024 Paris | 01:24:09 | |
| Kvistgaard Rasmus | 2024 Malaga | 01:24:14 | |
| Jung Suhyun | 2024 Incheon | 01:24:25 | |
| Howarth Harry | 2024 Sydney | 01:24:27 | |
| Henderson Neil | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:47 | |
| Battafarano Alessandro | 2024 Rimini | 01:24:18 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Berlin | 01:20:05 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
