Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 633 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Currie Ailsa's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Currie Ailsa's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Currie Ailsa's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Currie Ailsa's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:32 | 39:54 to 37:22 | 47.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:05 | 04:10 to 03:05 | 20.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:53 | 02:45 to 01:52 | 16.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:32 | 04:33 to 04:01 | 9.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:17 | 03:41 to 03:24 | 5.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:38 to 04:35 | 0.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:51 to 03:51 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:40 to 01:40 | 0.0% |
| Currie Ailsa | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:51 | 00:00 | 04:27 +00:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 04:51 | 04:47 -00:09 | 04:27 +00:24 |
| Running 2 | 04:43 | 09:29 | 04:43 +00:00 | 09:14 +00:15 |
| Sled Push | 02:45 | 14:12 | 02:19 +00:26 | 13:57 +00:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:00 | 16:57 | 04:56 +00:04 | 16:16 +00:41 |
| Sled Pull | 04:33 | 21:57 | 04:36 -00:03 | 21:12 +00:45 |
| Running 4 | 04:53 | 26:30 | 04:56 -00:03 | 25:48 +00:42 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:51 | 31:23 | 04:35 -00:44 | 30:44 +00:39 |
| Running 5 | 05:09 | 35:14 | 05:02 +00:07 | 35:19 -00:05 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 40:23 | 04:59 -00:18 | 40:21 +00:02 |
| Running 6 | 05:03 | 45:04 | 04:58 +00:05 | 45:20 -00:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:40 | 50:07 | 01:56 -00:16 | 50:18 -00:11 |
| Running 7 | 05:00 | 51:47 | 04:56 +00:04 | 52:14 -00:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:41 | 56:47 | 03:45 -00:04 | 57:10 -00:23 |
| Running 8 | 05:18 | 01:00:28 | 05:12 +00:06 | 01:00:55 -00:27 |
| Wall Balls | 04:10 | 01:05:46 | 03:44 +00:26 | 01:06:07 -00:21 |
| Roxzone | 05:10 | 01:14:59 | 05:08 +00:02 | 01:14:59 |
Ailsa Currie's performance in the 2024 Glasgow HYROX event was commendable, finishing in the top 1% overall and top 2% in her age group, showcasing her high level of fitness and competitive edge. Her total running time was slightly slower than average, suggesting a stronger performance in strength-based events compared to running. This indicates a hybrid profile with a slight inclination towards strength. Ailsa's pacing throughout the race appeared consistent, but there's room for improvement in maintaining or increasing speed in later running segments. The Roxzone time suggests a need for faster transitions and possibly improved overall fitness to minimize rest between exercises.
By focusing on these areas of improvement and employing strategic race strategies, Ailsa Currie can further enhance her performance in future HYROX events, potentially achieving even higher rankings both overall and within her age group.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Phiboolsook Chalisa | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:15:08 | |
| Eibeck Diana | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:14:44 | |
| Torcasio Joanne | 2024 Brisbane | 01:15:09 | |
| Schlaefcke Lea | 2022 Bremen | 01:15:00 | |
| Blackmore Jade | 2024 Dubai | 01:14:52 | |
| Juan Agorreta Sigrun | 2023 Barcelona | 01:14:35 | |
| Ryan Eve | 2022 Birmingham | 01:14:59 | |
| Düthorn Antje | 2023 München | 01:15:26 | |
| Regenkiewicz Anita | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:14:37 | |
| Ax Michelle | 2024 Malaga | 01:15:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
