Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Coyne Charles's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Coyne Charles's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Coyne Charles's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Coyne Charles's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 00:54 | 06:22 to 05:28 | 29.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:50 | 06:33 to 05:43 | 27.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:31 | 02:54 to 02:23 | 17.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:29 | 07:49 to 07:20 | 16.0% |
| Run Total | 00:17 | 46:35 to 46:18 | 9.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:44 to 02:44 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Coyne Charles | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:17 | 00:00 | 05:00 +00:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 05:17 | 04:37 -00:14 | 05:00 +00:17 |
| Running 2 | 05:24 | 09:40 | 05:25 -00:01 | 09:37 +00:03 |
| Sled Push | 02:44 | 15:04 | 03:15 -00:31 | 15:02 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:41 | 17:48 | 05:58 -00:17 | 18:17 -00:29 |
| Sled Pull | 06:22 | 23:29 | 05:38 +00:44 | 24:15 -00:46 |
| Running 4 | 05:46 | 29:51 | 05:55 -00:09 | 29:53 -00:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:46 | 35:37 | 06:20 -01:34 | 35:48 -00:11 |
| Running 5 | 05:46 | 40:23 | 06:09 -00:23 | 42:08 -01:45 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 46:09 | 05:03 -00:12 | 48:17 -02:08 |
| Running 6 | 05:49 | 51:00 | 05:59 -00:10 | 53:20 -02:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:54 | 56:49 | 02:26 +00:28 | 59:19 -02:30 |
| Running 7 | 05:54 | 59:43 | 05:57 -00:03 | 01:01:45 -02:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:33 | 01:05:37 | 05:55 +00:38 | 01:07:42 -02:05 |
| Running 8 | 07:01 | 01:12:10 | 06:51 +00:10 | 01:13:37 -01:27 |
| Wall Balls | 07:49 | 01:19:11 | 07:40 +00:09 | 01:20:28 -01:17 |
| Roxzone | 09:30 | 01:36:23 | 08:15 +01:15 | 01:36:23 |
Charles Coyne delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, finishing in the top 46% overall and the top 43% in his age group. His total running time of 46:35 was notably faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. However, while his running segments showed consistent pacing, the slower start in Running 1 suggests a need for better initial pacing strategies. Charles's strengths clearly lie in his running ability, complemented by solid performances in strength-centric tasks like the Ski Erg and Burpee Broad Jumps. Nonetheless, there's room for improvement in specific strength and transition segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Smith Darren | 2024 Birmingham | 01:36:23 | |
| Engstler Frank | 2024 Poznan | 01:36:01 | |
| Chan Tak Hei Manson | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:36:40 | |
| Rijna Pelle | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:36:32 | |
| Dierfeld Henning | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:36:12 | |
| Barthoulot Florian | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:36:15 | |
| Pollet Ricardo Pieter | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:36:34 | |
| Benyekkou Alexandre | 2024 Malaga | 01:36:16 | |
| Bakker Koen | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:36:12 | |
| Bessant Ian | 2024 London | 01:36:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
