Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Singapore using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 954 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Chen Llewellyn's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Chen Llewellyn's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Chen Llewellyn's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Chen Llewellyn's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:48 | 57:33 to 49:45 | 85.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:42 | 06:49 to 06:07 | 7.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:23 | 05:08 to 04:45 | 4.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:50 to 02:39 | 2.0% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 05:18 to 05:12 | 1.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:04 to 03:04 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:39 to 06:39 | 0.0% |
| Chen Llewellyn | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:17 | 00:00 | 05:15 +00:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:08 | 05:17 | 04:43 +00:25 | 05:15 +00:02 |
| Running 2 | 05:50 | 10:25 | 05:45 +00:05 | 09:58 +00:27 |
| Sled Push | 03:04 | 16:15 | 03:39 -00:35 | 15:43 +00:32 |
| Running 3 | 09:15 | 19:19 | 06:27 +02:48 | 19:22 -00:03 |
| Sled Pull | 06:49 | 28:34 | 06:17 +00:32 | 25:49 +02:45 |
| Running 4 | 06:16 | 35:23 | 06:26 -00:10 | 32:06 +03:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:22 | 41:39 | 07:04 -02:42 | 38:32 +03:07 |
| Running 5 | 06:34 | 46:01 | 06:42 -00:08 | 45:36 +00:25 |
| Rowing | 05:18 | 52:35 | 05:15 +00:03 | 52:18 +00:17 |
| Running 6 | 06:07 | 57:53 | 06:30 -00:23 | 57:33 +00:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:50 | 01:04:00 | 02:38 +00:12 | 01:04:03 -00:03 |
| Running 7 | 05:50 | 01:06:50 | 06:29 -00:39 | 01:06:41 +00:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:14 | 01:12:40 | 06:36 -01:22 | 01:13:10 -00:30 |
| Running 8 | 12:28 | 01:17:54 | 07:47 +04:41 | 01:19:46 -01:52 |
| Wall Balls | 06:39 | 01:30:22 | 08:39 -02:00 | 01:27:33 +02:49 |
| Roxzone | 08:40 | 01:45:33 | 09:21 -00:41 | 01:45:33 |
Llewellyn Chen demonstrated a commendable performance in the HYROX event, finishing in the top 44% overall and top 43% within his age group. Despite his solid ranking, there is notable room for improvement, particularly in the running segments. His total running time was 5:48 slower than the average, which points to a need for focus on running efficiency and endurance. Notably, his performance in strength-based exercises like the Burpees Broad Jump and Wall Balls were significantly better than average, indicating that Llewellyn excels in strength tasks. His pacing strategy showed a tendency to start at a moderate speed but struggle significantly in the later running segments (Running 3 and Running 8), suggesting an opportunity to enhance his endurance and pacing strategy for sustained performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cooney Martin | 2023 London | 01:45:35 | |
| Bella Toti | 2023 Manchester | 01:45:12 | |
| Cohan Mark | 2023 Dallas | 01:45:22 | |
| Klöcker Andreas | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:45:35 | |
| Carbajal Luis | 2024 Anaheim | 01:45:42 | |
| Liraque Romain | 2024 Paris | 01:45:46 | |
| Ellwood Andy | 2024 Glasgow | 01:46:03 | |
| Matondo Miguel | 2023 Hamburg | 01:45:16 | |
| Cantzler Dominic | 2018 Hamburg | 01:45:45 | |
| Verbart Ludo | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:45:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
